From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom-ep: Do not enable resources during probe()
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:16:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240822151658.GA305162@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822064823.x26bjqev6ye32v5j@thinkpad>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:18:23PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 05:56:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> ...
> > Although I do have the question of what happens if the RC deasserts
> > PERST# before qcom-ep is loaded. We probably don't execute
> > qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() in that case, so how does the init happen?
>
> PERST# is a level trigger signal. So even if the host has asserted
> it before EP booted, the level will stay low and ep will detect it
> while booting.
The PERST# signal itself is definitely level oriented.
I'm still skeptical about the *interrupt* from the PCIe controller
being level-triggered, as I mentioned here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240815224735.GA57931@bhelgaas
tegra194 is also dwc-based and has a similar PERST# interrupt but it's
edge-triggered (tegra_pcie_ep_pex_rst_irq()), which I think is a
cleaner implementation. Then you don't have to remember the current
state, switch between high and low trigger, worry about races and
missing a pulse, etc.
> If it is an edge trigger signal, then ep wouldn't be able to catch
> it as you suspected.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-22 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-27 9:06 [PATCH] PCI: qcom-ep: Do not enable resources during probe() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-27 10:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-08-13 17:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-13 20:27 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-08-13 20:25 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-08-21 22:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-22 6:48 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-22 15:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-08-22 15:40 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-22 17:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-23 4:41 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-23 22:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-24 2:19 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-24 16:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-24 16:34 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-09-01 16:34 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-08-15 18:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-16 5:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-16 12:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240822151658.GA305162@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.