All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	jack@suse.cz, chandan.babu@oracle.com, dchinner@redhat.com,
	hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, catherine.hoang@oracle.com,
	kbusch@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:44:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240822204407.GU865349@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c5fdd14-5c59-4292-b4b5-b0d49ba1bce6@oracle.com>

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 07:04:02PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 21/08/2024 18:11, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 09:48:00AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > > For when an inode is enabled for atomic writes, set FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE
> > > flag. Only direct IO is currently supported, so check for that also.
> > > 
> > > We rely on the block layer to reject atomic writes which exceed the bdev
> > > request_queue limits, so don't bother checking any such thing here.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >   fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > index 9b6530a4eb4a..3489d478809e 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > @@ -1149,6 +1149,18 @@ xfs_file_remap_range(
> > >   	return remapped > 0 ? remapped : ret;
> > >   }
> > > +static bool xfs_file_open_can_atomicwrite(
> > > +	struct inode		*inode,
> > > +	struct file		*file)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
> > > +
> > > +	if (!(file->f_flags & O_DIRECT))
> > > +		return false;
> > > +
> > > +	return xfs_inode_has_atomicwrites(ip);
> > 
> > ...and here too.  I do like the shift to having an incore flag that
> > controls whether you get untorn write support or not.
> 
> Do you mean that add a new member to xfs_inode to record this? If yes, it
> sounds ok, but we need to maintain consistency (of that member) whenever
> anything which can affect it changes, which is always a bit painful.

I actually meant something more like:

static bool
xfs_file_open_can_atomicwrite(
	struct file		*file,
	struct inode		*inode)
{
	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
	struct xfs_buftarg	*target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);

	if (!(file->f_flags & O_DIRECT))
		return false;
	if (!xfs_inode_has_atomicwrites(ip))
		return false;
	if (mp->m_dalign && (mp->m_dalign % ip->i_extsize))
		return false;
	if (mp->m_swidth && (mp->m_swidth % ip->i_extsize))
		return false;
	if (mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize < target->bt_bdev_awu_min)
		return false;
	if (xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize(ip) > target->bt_bdev_awu_max)
		return false;
	return true;
}

--D

> John
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-22 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-17  9:47 [PATCH v5 0/7] block atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2024-08-17  9:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] block/fs: Pass an iocb to generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-08-20 17:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-17  9:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] fs: Export generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-08-20 17:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-17  9:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] fs: iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-08-21 16:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-22 15:29     ` John Garry
2024-08-22 20:30       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-30 15:48         ` John Garry
2024-08-30 23:56           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-03 12:43             ` John Garry
2024-08-17  9:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES for forcealign John Garry
2024-08-21 17:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-22 17:45     ` John Garry
2024-08-22 20:38       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-23  8:39         ` John Garry
2024-08-23 16:03           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-17  9:47 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-08-21 17:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-17  9:47 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-08-21 17:10   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-17  9:48 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry
2024-08-21 17:11   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-22 18:04     ` John Garry
2024-08-22 20:44       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-08-23 10:41         ` John Garry
2024-08-23 15:52           ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240822204407.GU865349@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.