From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
toke@redhat.com, martin.lau@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
puranjay@kernel.org, xukuohai@huaweicloud.com, eddyz87@gmail.com,
iii@linux.ibm.com, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 21:09:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240825130943.7738-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240825130943.7738-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
This patch fixes a tailcall infinite loop issue caused by freplace.
Since commit 1c123c567fb1 ("bpf: Resolve fext program type when checking map compatibility"),
freplace prog is allowed to tail call its target prog. Then, when a
freplace prog attaches to its target prog's subprog and tail calls its
target prog, kernel will panic.
For example:
tc_bpf2bpf.c:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
\#include <linux/bpf.h>
\#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
__noinline
int subprog_tc(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
return skb->len * 2;
}
SEC("tc")
int entry_tc(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
return subprog_tc(skb);
}
char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_freplace.c:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
\#include <linux/bpf.h>
\#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
__uint(max_entries, 1);
__uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
__uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
} jmp_table SEC(".maps");
int count = 0;
static __noinline
int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
return 0;
}
SEC("freplace")
int entry_freplace(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
count++;
subprog_tail(skb);
subprog_tail(skb);
return count;
}
char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
The attach target of entry_freplace is subprog_tc, and the tail callee
in subprog_tail is entry_tc.
Then, the infinite loop will be entry_tc -> subprog_tc -> entry_freplace
-> subprog_tail --tailcall-> entry_tc, because tail_call_cnt in
entry_freplace will count from zero for every time of entry_freplace
execution. Kernel will panic:
[ 15.310490] BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at (____ptrval____)
(stack is (____ptrval____)..(____ptrval____))
[ 15.310490] Oops: stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[ 15.310490] CPU: 1 PID: 89 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE
6.10.0-rc6-g026dcdae8d3e-dirty #72
[ 15.310490] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX,
1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[ 15.310490] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_3a140cef239a4b4f_subprog_tail+0x14/0x53
[ 15.310490] Code: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc
cc cc cc cc cc f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 f3 0f 1e
fa <50> 50 53 41 55 48 89 fb 49 bd 00 2a 46 82 98 9c ff ff 48 89 df 4c
[ 15.310490] RSP: 0018:ffffb500c0aa0000 EFLAGS: 00000202
[ 15.310490] RAX: ffffb500c0aa0028 RBX: ffff9c98808b7e00 RCX:
0000000000008cb5
[ 15.310490] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff9c9882462a00 RDI:
ffff9c98808b7e00
[ 15.310490] RBP: ffffb500c0aa0000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[ 15.310490] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffffb500c01af000
[ 15.310490] R13: ffffb500c01cd000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
0000000000000000
[ 15.310490] FS: 00007f133b665140(0000) GS:ffff9c98bbd00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 15.310490] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 15.310490] CR2: ffffb500c0a9fff8 CR3: 0000000102478000 CR4:
00000000000006f0
[ 15.310490] Call Trace:
[ 15.310490] <#DF>
[ 15.310490] ? die+0x36/0x90
[ 15.310490] ? handle_stack_overflow+0x4d/0x60
[ 15.310490] ? exc_double_fault+0x117/0x1a0
[ 15.310490] ? asm_exc_double_fault+0x23/0x30
[ 15.310490] ? bpf_prog_3a140cef239a4b4f_subprog_tail+0x14/0x53
[ 15.310490] </#DF>
[ 15.310490] <TASK>
[ 15.310490] bpf_prog_85781a698094722f_entry+0x4c/0x64
[ 15.310490] bpf_prog_1c515f389a9059b4_entry2+0x19/0x1b
[ 15.310490] ...
[ 15.310490] bpf_prog_85781a698094722f_entry+0x4c/0x64
[ 15.310490] bpf_prog_1c515f389a9059b4_entry2+0x19/0x1b
[ 15.310490] bpf_test_run+0x210/0x370
[ 15.310490] ? bpf_test_run+0x128/0x370
[ 15.310490] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x388/0x7a0
[ 15.310490] __sys_bpf+0xdbf/0x2c40
[ 15.310490] ? clockevents_program_event+0x52/0xf0
[ 15.310490] ? lock_release+0xbf/0x290
[ 15.310490] __x64_sys_bpf+0x1e/0x30
[ 15.310490] do_syscall_64+0x68/0x140
[ 15.310490] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[ 15.310490] RIP: 0033:0x7f133b52725d
[ 15.310490] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa
48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f
05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 8b bb 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 15.310490] RSP: 002b:00007ffddbc10258 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000141
[ 15.310490] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffddbc10828 RCX:
00007f133b52725d
[ 15.310490] RDX: 0000000000000050 RSI: 00007ffddbc102a0 RDI:
000000000000000a
[ 15.310490] RBP: 00007ffddbc10270 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
00007ffddbc102a0
[ 15.310490] R10: 0000000000000064 R11: 0000000000000206 R12:
0000000000000004
[ 15.310490] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000558ec4c24890 R15:
00007f133b6ed000
[ 15.310490] </TASK>
[ 15.310490] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE)
[ 15.310490] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 15.310490] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_3a140cef239a4b4f_subprog_tail+0x14/0x53
[ 15.310490] Code: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc
cc cc cc cc cc f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 f3 0f 1e
fa <50> 50 53 41 55 48 89 fb 49 bd 00 2a 46 82 98 9c ff ff 48 89 df 4c
[ 15.310490] RSP: 0018:ffffb500c0aa0000 EFLAGS: 00000202
[ 15.310490] RAX: ffffb500c0aa0028 RBX: ffff9c98808b7e00 RCX:
0000000000008cb5
[ 15.310490] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff9c9882462a00 RDI:
ffff9c98808b7e00
[ 15.310490] RBP: ffffb500c0aa0000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[ 15.310490] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffffb500c01af000
[ 15.310490] R13: ffffb500c01cd000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
0000000000000000
[ 15.310490] FS: 00007f133b665140(0000) GS:ffff9c98bbd00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 15.310490] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 15.310490] CR2: ffffb500c0a9fff8 CR3: 0000000102478000 CR4:
00000000000006f0
[ 15.310490] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
[ 15.310490] Kernel Offset: 0x30000000 from 0xffffffff81000000
(relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
This patch fixes the issue by initializing tail_call_cnt at the prologue
of entry_tc.
Next, when call subprog_tc, the tail_call_cnt_ptr is propagated to
subprog_tc by rax.
Next, when jump to entry_freplace, the tail_call_cnt_ptr will be reused to
count tailcall in freplace prog.
Next, when call subprog_tail, the tail_call_cnt_ptr is propagated to
subprog_tail by rax.
Next, while tail calling to entry_tc, the tail_call_cnt on the stack of
entry_tc increments via the tail_call_cnt_ptr.
The whole procedure shows as the following JITed prog dumping.
bpftool p d j n entry_tc:
int entry_tc(struct __sk_buff * skb):
bpf_prog_1c515f389a9059b4_entry_tc:
; return subprog_tc(skb);
0: endbr64
4: xorq %rax, %rax ;; rax = 0 (tail_call_cnt)
7: nopl (%rax,%rax)
c: pushq %rbp
d: movq %rsp, %rbp
10: endbr64
14: cmpq $33, %rax ;; if rax > 33, rax = tcc_ptr
18: ja 0x20 ;; if rax > 33 goto 0x20 ---+
1a: pushq %rax ;; [rbp - 8] = rax = 0 |
1b: movq %rsp, %rax ;; rax = rbp - 8 |
1e: jmp 0x21 ;; ---------+ |
20: pushq %rax ;; <--------|---------------+
21: pushq %rax ;; <--------+ [rbp - 16] = rax
22: movq -16(%rbp), %rax ;; rax = tcc_ptr
29: callq 0x70 ;; call subprog_tc()
; return subprog_tc(skb);
2e: leave
2f: retq
int subprog_tc(struct __sk_buff * skb):
bpf_prog_1e8f76e2374a0607_subprog_tc:
; return skb->len * 2;
0: endbr64
4: nopl (%rax) ;; do not touch tail_call_cnt
7: jmp 0x108 ;; jump to entry_freplace()
c: pushq %rbp
d: movq %rsp, %rbp
10: endbr64
14: pushq %rax
15: pushq %rax
16: movl 112(%rdi), %eax
; return skb->len * 2;
19: shll %eax
; return skb->len * 2;
1b: leave
1c: retq
bpftool p d j n entry_freplace:
int entry_freplace(struct __sk_buff * skb):
bpf_prog_85781a698094722f_entry_freplace:
; int entry_freplace(struct __sk_buff *skb)
0: endbr64
4: nopl (%rax) ;; do not touch tail_call_cnt
7: nopl (%rax,%rax)
c: pushq %rbp
d: movq %rsp, %rbp
10: endbr64
14: cmpq $33, %rax ;; if rax > 33, rax = tcc_ptr
18: ja 0x20 ;; if rax > 33 goto 0x20 ---+
1a: pushq %rax ;; [rbp - 8] = rax = 0 |
1b: movq %rsp, %rax ;; rax = rbp - 8 |
1e: jmp 0x21 ;; ---------+ |
20: pushq %rax ;; <--------|---------------+
21: pushq %rax ;; <--------+ [rbp - 16] = rax
22: pushq %rbx ;; callee saved
23: pushq %r13 ;; callee saved
25: movq %rdi, %rbx ;; rbx = skb (callee saved)
; count++;
28: movabsq $-123406219759616, %r13
32: movl (%r13), %edi
36: addl $1, %edi
39: movl %edi, (%r13)
; subprog_tail(skb);
3d: movq %rbx, %rdi ;; rdi = skb
40: movq -16(%rbp), %rax ;; rax = tcc_ptr
47: callq 0x80 ;; call subprog_tail()
; subprog_tail(skb);
4c: movq %rbx, %rdi ;; rdi = skb
4f: movq -16(%rbp), %rax ;; rax = tcc_ptr
56: callq 0x80 ;; call subprog_tail()
; return count;
5b: movl (%r13), %eax
; return count;
5f: popq %r13
61: popq %rbx
62: leave
63: retq
int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff * skb):
bpf_prog_3a140cef239a4b4f_subprog_tail:
; int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
0: endbr64
4: nopl (%rax) ;; do not touch tail_call_cnt
7: nopl (%rax,%rax)
c: pushq %rbp
d: movq %rsp, %rbp
10: endbr64
14: pushq %rax ;; [rbp - 8] = rax (tcc_ptr)
15: pushq %rax ;; [rbp - 16] = rax (tcc_ptr)
16: pushq %rbx ;; callee saved
17: pushq %r13 ;; callee saved
19: movq %rdi, %rbx ;; rbx = skb
; asm volatile("r1 = %[ctx]\n\t"
1c: movabsq $-128494642337280, %r13 ;; r13 = jmp_table
26: movq %rbx, %rdi ;; 1st arg, skb
29: movq %r13, %rsi ;; 2nd arg, jmp_table
2c: xorl %edx, %edx ;; 3rd arg, index = 0
2e: movq -16(%rbp), %rax ;; rax = [rbp - 16] (tcc_ptr)
35: cmpq $33, (%rax)
39: jae 0x4e ;; if *tcc_ptr >= 33 goto 0x4e --------+
3b: nopl (%rax,%rax) ;; jmp bypass, toggled by poking |
40: addq $1, (%rax) ;; (*tcc_ptr)++ |
44: popq %r13 ;; callee saved |
46: popq %rbx ;; callee saved |
47: popq %rax ;; undo rbp-16 push |
48: popq %rax ;; undo rbp-8 push |
49: jmp 0xfffffffffffffe18 ;; tail call target, toggled by poking |
; return 0; ;; |
4e: popq %r13 ;; restore callee saved <--------------+
50: popq %rbx ;; restore callee saved
51: leave
52: retq
As a result, the tail_call_cnt is stored on the stack of entry_tc. And
the tail_call_cnt_ptr is propagated between subprog_tc, entry_freplace,
subprog_tail and entry_tc.
Furthermore, trampoline is required to propagate
tail_call_cnt/tail_call_cnt_ptr always, no matter whether there is
tailcall at run time.
So, it reuses trampoline flag "BIT(7)" to tell trampoline to propagate
the tail_call_cnt/tail_call_cnt_ptr, as BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX is not
used by any other arch BPF JIT.
However, the bad effect is that it requires initializing tail_call_cnt at
prologue always no matter whether the prog is tail_call_reachable, because
it is unable to confirm itself or its subprog[s] whether to be attached by
freplace prog.
And, when call subprog, tail_call_cnt_ptr is required to be propagated
to subprog always.
Fixes: 1c123c567fb1 ("bpf: Resolve fext program type when checking map compatibility")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
include/linux/bpf.h | 6 ++---
kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 4 ++--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 074b41fafbe3f..85d9af13f329f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ struct jit_context {
#define X86_PATCH_SIZE 5
/* Number of bytes that will be skipped on tailcall */
#define X86_TAIL_CALL_OFFSET (12 + ENDBR_INSN_SIZE)
+/* Number of extra bytes that will be skipped on poke */
+#define X86_POKE_EXTRA 3
static void push_r12(u8 **pprog)
{
@@ -440,18 +442,14 @@ static void emit_prologue_tail_call(u8 **pprog, bool is_subprog)
* while jumping to another program
*/
static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf,
- bool tail_call_reachable, bool is_subprog,
+ bool is_extension, bool is_subprog,
bool is_exception_cb)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
emit_cfi(&prog, is_subprog ? cfi_bpf_subprog_hash : cfi_bpf_hash);
- /* BPF trampoline can be made to work without these nops,
- * but let's waste 5 bytes for now and optimize later
- */
- emit_nops(&prog, X86_PATCH_SIZE);
if (!ebpf_from_cbpf) {
- if (tail_call_reachable && !is_subprog)
+ if (!is_extension && !is_subprog)
/* When it's the entry of the whole tailcall context,
* zeroing rax means initialising tail_call_cnt.
*/
@@ -460,6 +458,10 @@ static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf,
/* Keep the same instruction layout. */
emit_nops(&prog, 3); /* nop3 */
}
+ /* BPF trampoline can be made to work without these nops,
+ * but let's waste 5 bytes for now and optimize later
+ */
+ emit_nops(&prog, X86_PATCH_SIZE);
/* Exception callback receives FP as third parameter */
if (is_exception_cb) {
EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xF4); /* mov rsp, rsi */
@@ -483,7 +485,7 @@ static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf,
/* sub rsp, rounded_stack_depth */
if (stack_depth)
EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x81, 0xEC, round_up(stack_depth, 8));
- if (tail_call_reachable)
+ if (!ebpf_from_cbpf)
emit_prologue_tail_call(&prog, is_subprog);
*pprog = prog;
}
@@ -573,10 +575,13 @@ int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type t,
/*
* See emit_prologue(), for IBT builds the trampoline hook is preceded
- * with an ENDBR instruction.
+ * with an ENDBR instruction and 3 bytes tail_call_cnt initialization
+ * instruction.
*/
if (is_endbr(*(u32 *)ip))
ip += ENDBR_INSN_SIZE;
+ if (is_bpf_text_address((long)ip))
+ ip += X86_POKE_EXTRA;
return __bpf_arch_text_poke(ip, t, old_addr, new_addr);
}
@@ -1365,7 +1370,7 @@ static void emit_shiftx(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg, u8 src_reg, bool is64, u8 op)
static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image,
int oldproglen, struct jit_context *ctx, bool jmp_padding)
{
- bool tail_call_reachable = bpf_prog->aux->tail_call_reachable;
+ bool is_extension = bpf_prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT;
struct bpf_insn *insn = bpf_prog->insnsi;
bool callee_regs_used[4] = {};
int insn_cnt = bpf_prog->len;
@@ -1383,7 +1388,7 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
detect_reg_usage(insn, insn_cnt, callee_regs_used);
emit_prologue(&prog, bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth,
- bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog), tail_call_reachable,
+ bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog), is_extension,
bpf_is_subprog(bpf_prog), bpf_prog->aux->exception_cb);
/* Exception callback will clobber callee regs for its own use, and
* restore the original callee regs from main prog's stack frame.
@@ -2077,10 +2082,8 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
u8 *ip = image + addrs[i - 1];
func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
- if (tail_call_reachable) {
- LOAD_TAIL_CALL_CNT_PTR(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth);
- ip += 7;
- }
+ LOAD_TAIL_CALL_CNT_PTR(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth);
+ ip += 7;
if (!imm32)
return -EINVAL;
ip += x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(&prog, func, ip);
@@ -2877,7 +2880,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
* [ ... ]
* [ stack_arg2 ]
* RBP - arg_stack_off [ stack_arg1 ]
- * RSP [ tail_call_cnt_ptr ] BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX
+ * RSP [ tail_call_cnt_ptr ] BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL
*/
/* room for return value of orig_call or fentry prog */
@@ -2923,6 +2926,8 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
*/
if (is_endbr(*(u32 *)orig_call))
orig_call += ENDBR_INSN_SIZE;
+ if (is_bpf_text_address((long)orig_call))
+ orig_call += X86_POKE_EXTRA;
orig_call += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
}
@@ -2949,8 +2954,8 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
/* sub rsp, stack_size */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xEC, stack_size);
}
- if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
- EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */
+ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL)
+ EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */
/* mov QWORD PTR [rbp - rbx_off], rbx */
emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_6, -rbx_off);
@@ -3005,7 +3010,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
restore_regs(m, &prog, regs_off);
save_args(m, &prog, arg_stack_off, true);
- if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX) {
+ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL) {
/* Before calling the original function, load the
* tail_call_cnt_ptr from stack to rax.
*/
@@ -3025,6 +3030,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
/* remember return value in a stack for bpf prog to access */
emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8);
im->ip_after_call = image + (prog - (u8 *)rw_image);
+ emit_nops(&prog, X86_POKE_EXTRA);
emit_nops(&prog, X86_PATCH_SIZE);
}
@@ -3067,7 +3073,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *rw_im
ret = -EINVAL;
goto cleanup;
}
- } else if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX) {
+ } else if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL) {
/* Before running the original function, load the
* tail_call_cnt_ptr from stack to rax.
*/
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 00dc4dd28cbd9..aa4a2799eaed1 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1074,10 +1074,10 @@ struct btf_func_model {
*/
#define BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY BIT(6)
-/* Indicate that current trampoline is in a tail call context. Then, it has to
- * cache and restore tail_call_cnt to avoid infinite tail call loop.
+/* Indicate that current trampoline is required to cache and restore
+ * tail_call_cnt or tail_call_cnt_ptr to avoid infinite tail call loop.
*/
-#define BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX BIT(7)
+#define BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL BIT(7)
/*
* Indicate the trampoline should be suitable to receive indirect calls;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index f8302a5ca400d..257adbc83bae3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -409,8 +409,8 @@ static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, bool lock_direct_mut
goto out;
}
- /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY and TAIL_CALL_CTX */
- tr->flags &= (BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY | BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX);
+ /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY and TAIL_CALL */
+ tr->flags &= (BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY | BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL);
if (tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT].nr_links ||
tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN].nr_links) {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1485364464576..aecd4d7cdf205 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -22096,8 +22096,8 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (!tr)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (tgt_prog && tgt_prog->aux->tail_call_reachable)
- tr->flags = BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX;
+ if (tgt_prog)
+ tr->flags = BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL;
prog->aux->dst_trampoline = tr;
return 0;
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-25 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-25 13:09 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Fix tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace Leon Hwang
2024-08-25 13:09 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2024-08-27 10:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf, x64: " Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-27 12:48 ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-27 20:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-28 2:36 ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-28 16:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-29 2:14 ` Leon Hwang
2024-09-02 10:19 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-09-02 16:33 ` Vincent Li
2024-08-25 13:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf, arm64: " Leon Hwang
2024-08-26 14:32 ` Xu Kuohai
2024-08-27 2:23 ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-30 7:37 ` Xu Kuohai
2024-08-30 9:08 ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-30 10:00 ` Xu Kuohai
2024-08-30 12:11 ` Leon Hwang
2024-08-30 16:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-05 9:13 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-09-06 14:32 ` Leon Hwang
2024-09-06 15:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-09-07 7:03 ` Xu Kuohai
2024-08-25 13:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for another tailcall infinite loop fixing Leon Hwang
2024-08-25 13:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Fix verifier tailcall jit selftest Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240825130943.7738-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.