All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com,mhocko@suse.com,hch@infradead.org,bhe@redhat.com,urezki@gmail.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-vmalloc-refactor-vm_area_alloc_pages-function.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:51:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240827195137.70503C4FF1A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm: vmalloc: refactor vm_area_alloc_pages() function
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-vmalloc-refactor-vm_area_alloc_pages-function.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-vmalloc-refactor-vm_area_alloc_pages-function.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: mm: vmalloc: refactor vm_area_alloc_pages() function
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 21:09:16 +0200

The aim is to simplify and making the vm_area_alloc_pages()
function less confusing as it became more clogged nowadays:

- eliminate a "bulk_gfp" variable and do not overwrite a gfp
  flag for bulk allocator;
- drop __GFP_NOFAIL flag for high-order-page requests on upper
  layer. It becomes less spread between levels when it comes to
  __GFP_NOFAIL allocations;
- add a comment about a fallback path if high-order attempt is
  unsuccessful because for such cases __GFP_NOFAIL is dropped;
- fix a typo in a commit message.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827190916.34242-1-urezki@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/vmalloc.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-refactor-vm_area_alloc_pages-function
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -3531,8 +3531,6 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 		unsigned int order, unsigned int nr_pages, struct page **pages)
 {
 	unsigned int nr_allocated = 0;
-	gfp_t alloc_gfp = gfp;
-	bool nofail = gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL;
 	struct page *page;
 	int i;
 
@@ -3543,9 +3541,6 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 	 * more permissive.
 	 */
 	if (!order) {
-		/* bulk allocator doesn't support nofail req. officially */
-		gfp_t bulk_gfp = gfp & ~__GFP_NOFAIL;
-
 		while (nr_allocated < nr_pages) {
 			unsigned int nr, nr_pages_request;
 
@@ -3563,12 +3558,11 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 			 * but mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving.
 			 */
 			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
-				nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy_noprof(bulk_gfp,
+				nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy_noprof(gfp,
 							nr_pages_request,
 							pages + nr_allocated);
-
 			else
-				nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_node_noprof(bulk_gfp, nid,
+				nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_node_noprof(gfp, nid,
 							nr_pages_request,
 							pages + nr_allocated);
 
@@ -3582,30 +3576,24 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 			if (nr != nr_pages_request)
 				break;
 		}
-	} else if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
-		/*
-		 * Higher order nofail allocations are really expensive and
-		 * potentially dangerous (pre-mature OOM, disruptive reclaim
-		 * and compaction etc.
-		 */
-		alloc_gfp &= ~__GFP_NOFAIL;
 	}
 
 	/* High-order pages or fallback path if "bulk" fails. */
 	while (nr_allocated < nr_pages) {
-		if (!nofail && fatal_signal_pending(current))
+		if (!(gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL) && fatal_signal_pending(current))
 			break;
 
 		if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
-			page = alloc_pages_noprof(alloc_gfp, order);
+			page = alloc_pages_noprof(gfp, order);
 		else
-			page = alloc_pages_node_noprof(nid, alloc_gfp, order);
+			page = alloc_pages_node_noprof(nid, gfp, order);
+
 		if (unlikely(!page))
 			break;
 
 		/*
 		 * Higher order allocations must be able to be treated as
-		 * indepdenent small pages by callers (as they can with
+		 * independent small pages by callers (as they can with
 		 * small-page vmallocs). Some drivers do their own refcounting
 		 * on vmalloc_to_page() pages, some use page->mapping,
 		 * page->lru, etc.
@@ -3666,7 +3654,16 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct
 	set_vm_area_page_order(area, page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT);
 	page_order = vm_area_page_order(area);
 
-	area->nr_pages = vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN,
+	/*
+	 * Higher order nofail allocations are really expensive and
+	 * potentially dangerous (pre-mature OOM, disruptive reclaim
+	 * and compaction etc.
+	 *
+	 * Please note, the __vmalloc_node_range_noprof() falls-back
+	 * to order-0 pages if high-order attempt is unsuccessful.
+	 */
+	area->nr_pages = vm_area_alloc_pages((page_order ?
+		gfp_mask & ~__GFP_NOFAIL : gfp_mask) | __GFP_NOWARN,
 		node, page_order, nr_small_pages, area->pages);
 
 	atomic_long_add(area->nr_pages, &nr_vmalloc_pages);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from urezki@gmail.com are

mm-vmalloc-refactor-vm_area_alloc_pages-function.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2024-08-27 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240827195137.70503C4FF1A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.