All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
	Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: legacy PCI device behind a bridge not getting a valid IRQ on imx host controller
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:22:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240829212235.GA68646@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU2YVpQ=csr-O65L_pcNFWbFMvHK4XO44cbfUfPKwuw6vg@mail.gmail.com>

[+cc Richard, Lucas, maintainers of IMX6 PCI]

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 02:40:33PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I have a user that is using an IMX8MM SoC (dwc controller) with a
> miniPCIe card that has a PEX8112 PCI-to-PCIe bridge to a legacy PCI
> device and the device is not getting a valid interrupt.

Does pci-imx6.c support INTx at all?

I see that drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c supports both host
and endpoint modes, but the only mention of "intx" is for an IMX
device in endpoint mode to raise an INTx interrupt.

A few DWC-based drivers look like they support INTx:

  dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain
  ks_pcie_config_intx_irq
  rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain (the dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c one)
  uniphier_pcie_config_intx_irq

but most (including pci-imx6.c) don't have anything that looks like
those.

> The PCI bus looks like this:
> 00.00.0: 16c3:abcd (rev 01)
> 01:00.0: 10b5:8112
> ^^^ PEX8112 x1 Lane PCI bridge
> 02:00.0: 4ddc:1a00
> 02:01.0: 4ddc:1a00
> ^^^ PCI devices
> 
> lspci -vvv -s 02:00.0:
> 02:00.0 Communication controller: ILC Data Device Corp Device 1a00 (rev 10)
>         Subsystem: ILC Data Device Corp Device 1a00
>         Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
>         Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium
> >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>         Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0
>         Region 0: Memory at 18100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
> [disabled] [size=256K]
>         Region 1: Memory at 18180000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
> [disabled] [size=4K]
> ^^^ 'Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0' is wrong
> 
> I found an old thread from 2019 on an NVidia forum [1] where the same
> thing occurred and Nvidia's solution was a patch to the dwc driver to
> call pci_fixup_irqs():
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index ec2e4a61aa4e..a72ba177a5fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -477,6 +477,8 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>         if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
>                 pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
> 
> +       pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
> +
>         pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
>         pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
> 
> Since that time the pci/dwc drivers have changed quite a bit;
> pci_fixup_irqs() was changed to pci_assign_irq() called now from
> pcie_device_probe() and dw_pcie_host_init() calls commit init
> functions.
> 
> While I don't have the particular card in hand described above yet to
> test with, I did manage to reproduce this on an imx6dl soc (same dwc
> controller and driver) connected to a TI XIO2001 with an Intel I210
> behind it and see the exact same issue.
> 
> Does anyone understand why legacy PCI interrupt mapping behind a
> bridge isn't working here?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Tim
> [1] https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/xavier-not-routing-pci-interrupts-across-pex8112-bridge/78556

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-29 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-28 21:40 legacy PCI device behind a bridge not getting a valid IRQ on imx host controller Tim Harvey
2024-08-29 21:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-08-29 21:43   ` Frank Li
2024-08-29 22:00     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-29 22:21       ` Tim Harvey
2024-08-30 15:52         ` Frank Li
2024-08-30 16:11           ` Tim Harvey
2024-08-30 15:49       ` Frank Li
2024-08-30 16:06         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-30 16:15         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-30  1:50   ` Hongxing Zhu
2024-08-30 16:03     ` Tim Harvey
2024-08-30 16:14       ` Frank Li
2024-09-06 19:37         ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-06 19:58           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-10 16:50             ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-10 23:04               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-12 23:28                 ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-23 17:56                   ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-26 22:30                     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240829212235.GA68646@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.