From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
kernel-team@android.com, Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Subject: [RESEND][PATCH v12 1/7] locking/mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:52:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240829225212.6042-2-jstultz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829225212.6042-1-jstultz@google.com>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
In preparation to nest mutex::wait_lock under rq::lock we need
to remove wakeups from under it.
Do this by utilizing wake_qs to defer the wakeup until after the
lock is dropped.
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>
Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Reviewed-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[Heavily changed after 55f036ca7e74 ("locking: WW mutex cleanup") and
08295b3b5bee ("locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait
mutexes")]
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
[jstultz: rebased to mainline, added extra wake_up_q & init
to avoid hangs, similar to Connor's rework of this patch]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
v5:
* Reverted back to an earlier version of this patch to undo
the change that kept the wake_q in the ctx structure, as
that broke the rule that the wake_q must always be on the
stack, as its not safe for concurrency.
v6:
* Made tweaks suggested by Waiman Long
v7:
* Fixups to pass wake_qs down for PREEMPT_RT logic
v10:
* Switched preempt_enable to be lower close to the unlock as
suggested by Valentin
* Added additional preempt_disable coverage around the wake_q
calls as again noted by Valentin
v12:
* Fixes and simplifications from K Prateek Nayak and Peter Zijlstra
* Commit message tweak
---
kernel/futex/pi.c | 6 +++-
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 16 ++++++++---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c | 11 ++++++--
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 3 +-
kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c | 8 +++++-
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 4 +--
kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 3 +-
kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 30 ++++++++++++--------
9 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex/pi.c b/kernel/futex/pi.c
index 5722467f27379..d62cca5ed8f4c 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/pi.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/pi.c
@@ -922,6 +922,7 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int tryl
struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter;
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
struct futex_q q = futex_q_init;
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
int res, ret;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI))
@@ -1018,8 +1019,11 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int tryl
* such that futex_unlock_pi() is guaranteed to observe the waiter when
* it sees the futex_q::pi_state.
*/
- ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current);
+ ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current, &wake_q);
+ preempt_disable();
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ preempt_enable();
if (ret) {
if (ret == 1)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index cbae8c0b89ab2..6c94da061ec25 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip,
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx)
{
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
struct mutex_waiter waiter;
struct ww_mutex *ww;
int ret;
@@ -625,7 +626,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
*/
if (__mutex_trylock(lock)) {
if (ww_ctx)
- __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx);
+ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx, &wake_q);
goto skip_wait;
}
@@ -645,7 +646,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
* Add in stamp order, waking up waiters that must kill
* themselves.
*/
- ret = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(&waiter, lock, ww_ctx);
+ ret = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(&waiter, lock, ww_ctx, &wake_q);
if (ret)
goto err_early_kill;
}
@@ -681,6 +682,10 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
}
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ /* Make sure we do wakeups before calling schedule */
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ wake_q_init(&wake_q);
+
schedule_preempt_disabled();
first = __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter);
@@ -714,7 +719,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
*/
if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die &&
!__mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter))
- __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx);
+ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx, &wake_q);
}
__mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
@@ -730,6 +735,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
preempt_enable();
return 0;
@@ -741,6 +747,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
preempt_enable();
return ret;
}
@@ -951,9 +958,10 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
if (owner & MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF)
__mutex_handoff(lock, next);
+ preempt_disable();
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
-
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ preempt_enable();
}
#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 88d08eeb8bc03..e5a6dc82508c7 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -34,13 +34,15 @@
static inline int __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
return 0;
}
static inline void __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
}
@@ -1201,7 +1203,8 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct task_struct *task,
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
- enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
+ enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter;
@@ -1245,7 +1248,10 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
/* Check whether the waiter should back out immediately */
rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex);
- res = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(waiter, rtm, ww_ctx);
+ preempt_disable();
+ res = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(waiter, rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q);
+ wake_up_q(wake_q);
+ preempt_enable();
if (res) {
raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock);
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
@@ -1678,7 +1684,8 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
unsigned int state,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
- struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
struct rt_mutex *rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex);
struct ww_mutex *ww = ww_container_of(rtm);
@@ -1689,7 +1696,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
/* Try to acquire the lock again: */
if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) {
if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) {
- __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx);
+ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q);
ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx);
}
return 0;
@@ -1699,7 +1706,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT);
- ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, ww_ctx, chwalk);
+ ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, ww_ctx, chwalk, wake_q);
if (likely(!ret))
ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, ww_ctx, state, NULL, waiter);
@@ -1707,7 +1714,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
/* acquired the lock */
if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) {
if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die)
- __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx);
+ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q);
ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx);
}
} else {
@@ -1729,7 +1736,8 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
static inline int __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
- unsigned int state)
+ unsigned int state,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
int ret;
@@ -1738,7 +1746,7 @@ static inline int __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
waiter.ww_ctx = ww_ctx;
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, ww_ctx, state, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
- &waiter);
+ &waiter, wake_q);
debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
return ret;
@@ -1754,6 +1762,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
unsigned int state)
{
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
@@ -1775,8 +1784,11 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
* irqsave/restore variants.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
- ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state);
+ ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state, &wake_q);
+ preempt_disable();
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ preempt_enable();
rt_mutex_post_schedule();
return ret;
@@ -1803,7 +1815,8 @@ static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
* rtlock_slowlock_locked - Slow path lock acquisition for RT locks
* @lock: The underlying RT mutex
*/
-static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
+static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
struct task_struct *owner;
@@ -1820,7 +1833,7 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT);
- task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
+ task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, wake_q);
for (;;) {
/* Try to acquire the lock again */
@@ -1831,7 +1844,11 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
else
owner = NULL;
+ preempt_disable();
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+ wake_up_q(wake_q);
+ wake_q_init(wake_q);
+ preempt_enable();
if (!owner || !rtmutex_spin_on_owner(lock, &waiter, owner))
schedule_rtlock();
@@ -1856,10 +1873,14 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
static __always_inline void __sched rtlock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
- rtlock_slowlock_locked(lock);
+ rtlock_slowlock_locked(lock, &wake_q);
+ preempt_disable();
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ preempt_enable();
}
#endif /* RT_MUTEX_BUILD_SPINLOCKS */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
index a6974d0445930..747f2da160372 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
@@ -291,7 +291,8 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
*/
int __sched __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- struct task_struct *task)
+ struct task_struct *task,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
int ret;
@@ -302,7 +303,7 @@ int __sched __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, NULL,
- RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+ RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK, wake_q);
if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
/*
@@ -341,12 +342,16 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
struct task_struct *task)
{
int ret;
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
- ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task);
+ ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task, &wake_q);
if (unlikely(ret))
remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
+ preempt_disable();
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ preempt_enable();
return ret;
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
index 1162e07cdaea1..c38a2d2d4a7ee 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock);
extern int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
- struct task_struct *task);
+ struct task_struct *task,
+ struct wake_q_head *);
extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct task_struct *task);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
index 34a59569db6be..9f4322c074862 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
unsigned int state)
{
struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
int ret;
rwbase_pre_schedule();
@@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
* For rwlocks this returns 0 unconditionally, so the below
* !ret conditionals are optimized out.
*/
- ret = rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state);
+ ret = rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state, &wake_q);
/*
* On success the rtmutex is held, so there can't be a writer
@@ -121,7 +122,12 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
*/
if (!ret)
atomic_inc(&rwb->readers);
+
+ preempt_disable();
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ preempt_enable();
+
if (!ret)
rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 33cac79e39946..cdb149135f93a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -1415,8 +1415,8 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
#define rwbase_rtmutex_lock_state(rtm, state) \
__rt_mutex_lock(rtm, state)
-#define rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state) \
- __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, NULL, state)
+#define rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state, wq) \
+ __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, NULL, state, wq)
#define rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm) \
__rt_mutex_unlock(rtm)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
index 38e292454fccb..fb1810a14c9dd 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ rwbase_rtmutex_lock_state(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm, unsigned int state)
}
static __always_inline int
-rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm, unsigned int state)
+rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm, unsigned int state,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
rtlock_slowlock_locked(rtm);
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
index 3ad2cc4823e59..0a05de8728411 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ __ww_ctx_less(struct ww_acquire_ctx *a, struct ww_acquire_ctx *b)
*/
static bool
__ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die)
return false;
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
#ifndef WW_RT
debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter);
#endif
- wake_up_process(waiter->task);
+ wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task);
}
return true;
@@ -299,7 +299,8 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
*/
static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock,
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx)
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
struct task_struct *owner = __ww_mutex_owner(lock);
@@ -331,7 +332,7 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock,
* wakeup pending to re-read the wounded state.
*/
if (owner != current)
- wake_up_process(owner);
+ wake_q_add(wake_q, owner);
return true;
}
@@ -352,7 +353,8 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock,
* The current task must not be on the wait list.
*/
static void
-__ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+__ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur;
@@ -364,8 +366,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
if (!cur->ww_ctx)
continue;
- if (__ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx) ||
- __ww_mutex_wound(lock, cur->ww_ctx, ww_ctx))
+ if (__ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx, wake_q) ||
+ __ww_mutex_wound(lock, cur->ww_ctx, ww_ctx, wake_q))
break;
}
}
@@ -377,6 +379,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
static __always_inline void
ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
{
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+
ww_mutex_lock_acquired(lock, ctx);
/*
@@ -405,8 +409,11 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
* die or wound us.
*/
lock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
- __ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx);
+ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx, &wake_q);
+ preempt_disable();
unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+ preempt_enable();
}
static __always_inline int
@@ -488,7 +495,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_kill(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
static inline int
__ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
struct MUTEX *lock,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
+ struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
{
struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur, *pos = NULL;
bool is_wait_die;
@@ -532,7 +540,7 @@ __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
pos = cur;
/* Wait-Die: ensure younger waiters die. */
- __ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx);
+ __ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx, wake_q);
}
__ww_waiter_add(lock, waiter, pos);
@@ -550,7 +558,7 @@ __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
* such that either we or the fastpath will wound @ww->ctx.
*/
smp_mb();
- __ww_mutex_wound(lock, ww_ctx, ww->ctx);
+ __ww_mutex_wound(lock, ww_ctx, ww->ctx, wake_q);
}
return 0;
--
2.46.0.469.g59c65b2a67-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-29 22:52 [RESEND][PATCH v12 0/7] Preparatory changes for Proxy Execution v12 John Stultz
2024-08-29 22:52 ` John Stultz [this message]
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [RESEND][PATCH v12 2/7] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock irq safe John Stultz
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [RESEND][PATCH v12 3/7] locking/mutex: Expose __mutex_owner() John Stultz
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [RESEND][PATCH v12 4/7] sched: Add move_queued_task_locked helper John Stultz
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [RESEND][PATCH v12 5/7] sched: Consolidate pick_*_task to task_is_pushable helper John Stultz
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [RESEND][PATCH v12 6/7] sched: Split out __schedule() deactivate task logic into a helper John Stultz
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [RESEND][PATCH v12 7/7] sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240829225212.6042-2-jstultz@google.com \
--to=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.