From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
oleg@redhat.com
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, surenb@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 01:41:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202408310130.t9EBKteQ-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829183741.3331213-9-andrii@kernel.org>
Hi Andrii,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/perf/core]
[also build test ERROR on next-20240830]
[cannot apply to perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next perf-tools/perf-tools linus/master acme/perf/core v6.11-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrii-Nakryiko/uprobes-revamp-uprobe-refcounting-and-lifetime-management/20240830-024135
base: tip/perf/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240829183741.3331213-9-andrii%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v4 8/8] uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-004-20240830 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240831/202408310130.t9EBKteQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240831/202408310130.t9EBKteQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408310130.t9EBKteQ-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/events/uprobes.c:1157:2: error: call to undeclared function 'synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1157 | synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace();
| ^
kernel/events/uprobes.c:1157:2: note: did you mean 'synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude'?
include/linux/rcupdate.h:206:6: note: 'synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude' declared here
206 | void synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude(void);
| ^
1 error generated.
vim +/synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace +1157 kernel/events/uprobes.c
1145
1146 void uprobe_unregister_sync(void)
1147 {
1148 /*
1149 * Now that handler_chain() and handle_uretprobe_chain() iterate over
1150 * uprobe->consumers list under RCU protection without holding
1151 * uprobe->register_rwsem, we need to wait for RCU grace period to
1152 * make sure that we can't call into just unregistered
1153 * uprobe_consumer's callbacks anymore. If we don't do that, fast and
1154 * unlucky enough caller can free consumer's memory and cause
1155 * handler_chain() or handle_uretprobe_chain() to do an use-after-free.
1156 */
> 1157 synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace();
1158 }
1159 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister_sync);
1160
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-29 18:37 [PATCH v4 0/8] uprobes: RCU-protected hot path optimizations Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-29 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] uprobes: revamp uprobe refcounting and lifetime management Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-29 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] uprobes: protected uprobe lifetime with SRCU Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-29 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] uprobes: get rid of enum uprobe_filter_ctx in uprobe filter callbacks Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-29 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] uprobes: travers uprobe's consumer list locklessly under SRCU protection Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-29 23:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-08-29 23:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-30 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-08-30 14:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-30 15:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-30 20:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-30 20:43 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-31 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-02 9:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-03 17:27 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-03 17:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-03 18:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-03 18:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-31 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-01 9:24 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-08-30 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-29 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] perf/uprobe: split uprobe_unregister() Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-29 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] rbtree: provide rb_find_rcu() / rb_find_add_rcu() Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-29 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] uprobes: perform lockless SRCU-protected uprobes_tree lookup Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-29 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-30 17:41 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-08-30 17:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-30 20:36 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-30 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] uprobes: RCU-protected hot path optimizations Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-03 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-03 13:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-03 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202408310130.t9EBKteQ-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.