From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@intel.com>,
Sanjay K Kumar <sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/14] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v6.12
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:27:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240902022724.67059-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Hi Joerg,
The following changes have been queued for v6.12-rc1. They are about new
features and code refactoring, including:
- Retire si_domain and convert to use static identity domain
- Batched IOTLB/dev-IOTLB invalidation
- Small code refactoring and cleanups
These patches are based on v6.11-rc6. The complete patches are also
available at:
https://github.com/LuBaolu/intel-iommu/commits/vtd-update-for-v6.12
Please consider them for iommu next.
Best regards,
baolu
Lu Baolu (10):
iommu/vt-d: Require DMA domain if hardware not support passthrough
iommu/vt-d: Remove identity mappings from si_domain
iommu/vt-d: Always reserve a domain ID for identity setup
iommu/vt-d: Remove has_iotlb_device flag
iommu/vt-d: Factor out helpers from domain_context_mapping_one()
iommu/vt-d: Add support for static identity domain
iommu/vt-d: Cleanup si_domain
iommu/vt-d: Move PCI PASID enablement to probe path
iommu/vt-d: Unconditionally flush device TLB for pasid table updates
iommu/vt-d: Add qi_batch for dmar_domain
Sanjay K Kumar (1):
iommu/vt-d: Fix potential lockup if qi_submit_sync called with 0 count
Tina Zhang (3):
iommu/vt-d: Factor out invalidation descriptor composition
iommu/vt-d: Refactor IOTLB and Dev-IOTLB flush for batching
iommu/vt-d: Introduce batched cache invalidation
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 128 ++++++++-
drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c | 239 ++++++++++++-----
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 109 ++------
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 503 +++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 3 +-
drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 12 +-
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 7 +-
7 files changed, 547 insertions(+), 454 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-09-02 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-02 2:27 Lu Baolu [this message]
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 01/14] iommu/vt-d: Require DMA domain if hardware not support passthrough Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 02/14] iommu/vt-d: Remove identity mappings from si_domain Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 03/14] iommu/vt-d: Always reserve a domain ID for identity setup Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 04/14] iommu/vt-d: Remove has_iotlb_device flag Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 05/14] iommu/vt-d: Factor out helpers from domain_context_mapping_one() Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 06/14] iommu/vt-d: Add support for static identity domain Lu Baolu
2025-02-21 7:16 ` Question on context setup for passthrough Jerry Snitselaar
2025-02-21 8:40 ` Baolu Lu
2025-02-21 10:07 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2025-02-21 18:26 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2025-02-23 14:24 ` Baolu Lu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 07/14] iommu/vt-d: Cleanup si_domain Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 08/14] iommu/vt-d: Fix potential lockup if qi_submit_sync called with 0 count Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 09/14] iommu/vt-d: Move PCI PASID enablement to probe path Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 10/14] iommu/vt-d: Unconditionally flush device TLB for pasid table updates Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 11/14] iommu/vt-d: Factor out invalidation descriptor composition Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 12/14] iommu/vt-d: Refactor IOTLB and Dev-IOTLB flush for batching Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 13/14] iommu/vt-d: Add qi_batch for dmar_domain Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 2:27 ` [PATCH 14/14] iommu/vt-d: Introduce batched cache invalidation Lu Baolu
2024-09-02 16:15 ` [PATCH 00/14] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v6.12 Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240902022724.67059-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=tina.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.