From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,mhocko@suse.com,mgorman@techsingularity.net,lizefan.x@bytedance.com,hannes@cmpxchg.org,hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-page_alloc-fix-the-null-ac-nodemask-in-__alloc_pages_slowpath.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 21:19:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240904041900.92ACDC4CEC2@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm:page_alloc: fix the NULL ac->nodemask in __alloc_pages_slowpath()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-page_alloc-fix-the-null-ac-nodemask-in-__alloc_pages_slowpath.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>
Subject: mm:page_alloc: fix the NULL ac->nodemask in __alloc_pages_slowpath()
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:26:12 +0800
should_reclaim_retry() is not ALLOC_CPUSET aware and that means that it
considers reclaimability of NUMA nodes which are outside of the cpuset.
If other nodes have a lot of reclaimable memory then should_reclaim_retry
would instruct page allocator to retry even though there is no memory
reclaimable on the cpuset nodemask. This is not really a huge problem
because the number of retries without any reclaim progress is bound but it
could be certainly improved. This is a cold path so this shouldn't really
have a measurable impact on performance on most workloads.
1.Test step and the machines.
------------
root@vm:/sys/fs/cgroup/test# numactl -H | grep size
node 0 size: 9477 MB
node 1 size: 10079 MB
node 2 size: 10079 MB
node 3 size: 10078 MB
root@vm:/sys/fs/cgroup/test# cat cpuset.mems
2
root@vm:/sys/fs/cgroup/test# stress --vm 1 --vm-bytes 12g --vm-keep
stress: info: [33430] dispatching hogs: 0 cpu, 0 io, 1 vm, 0 hdd
stress: FAIL: [33430] (425) <-- worker 33431 got signal 9
stress: WARN: [33430] (427) now reaping child worker processes
stress: FAIL: [33430] (461) failed run completed in 2s
2. reclaim_retry_zone info:
We can only alloc pages from node=2, but the reclaim_retry_zone is
node=0 and return true.
root@vm:/sys/kernel/debug/tracing# cat trace
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.617311: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=1 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.617682: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=2 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.618103: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=3 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.618454: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=4 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.618770: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=5 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.619150: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=6 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.619510: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=7 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.619850: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=8 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.620171: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=9 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.620533: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=10 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.620894: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=11 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.621224: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=12 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.621551: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=13 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.621847: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=14 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.622200: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=15 wmark_check=1
stress-33431 [001] ..... 13223.622580: reclaim_retry_zone: node=0 zone=Normal order=0 reclaimable=4260 available=1772019 min_wmark=5962 no_progress_loops=16 wmark_check=1
With this patch, we can check the right node and get less retry in
__alloc_pages_slowpath() because there is nothing to do.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240822092612.3209286-1-hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/compaction.c | 6 ++++++
mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-page_alloc-fix-the-null-ac-nodemask-in-__alloc_pages_slowpath
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/freezer.h>
#include <linux/page_owner.h>
#include <linux/psi.h>
+#include <linux/cpuset.h>
#include "internal.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
@@ -2822,6 +2823,11 @@ enum compact_result try_to_compact_pages
ac->highest_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) {
enum compact_result status;
+ if (cpusets_enabled() &&
+ (alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) &&
+ !__cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, gfp_mask))
+ continue;
+
if (prio > MIN_COMPACT_PRIORITY
&& compaction_deferred(zone, order)) {
rc = max_t(enum compact_result, COMPACT_DEFERRED, rc);
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-fix-the-null-ac-nodemask-in-__alloc_pages_slowpath
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4092,6 +4092,11 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, uns
unsigned long min_wmark = min_wmark_pages(zone);
bool wmark;
+ if (cpusets_enabled() &&
+ (alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) &&
+ !__cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, gfp_mask))
+ continue;
+
available = reclaimable = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
available += zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com are
reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240904041900.92ACDC4CEC2@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.