All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: 文博李 <liwenbo.martin@bytedance.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jiahui Cen" <cenjiahui@bytedance.com>,
	"Ying Fang" <fangying.tommy@bytedance.com>,
	jasowang@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_net: Fix mismatched buf address when unmapping for small packets
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 06:57:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240904065626-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1725435002.9733856-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 03:30:02PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:21:28 +0800, =?utf-8?b?5paH5Y2a5p2O?= <liwenbo.martin@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > When SWIOTLB is enabled, a DMA map will allocate a bounce buffer for real
> > DMA operations,
> > and when unmapping, SWIOTLB copies the content in the bounce buffer to the
> > driver-allocated
> > buffer (the `buf` variable). Such copy only synchronizes data in the buffer
> > range, not the whole page.
> > So we should give the correct offset for DMA unmapping.
> 
> I see.
> 
> But I think we should pass the "correct" buf to virtio core as the "data" by
> virtqueue_add_inbuf_ctx().
> 
> In the merge mode, we pass the pointer that points to the virtnet header.
> In the small mode, we pass the pointer that points to the virtnet header - offset.
> 
> But this is not the only problem, we try to get the virtnet header by the buf
> inside receive_buf(before receive_small).
> 
> 	flags = ((struct virtio_net_common_hdr *)buf)->hdr.flags;
> 
> So I think it is time to unify the buf that passed to the virtio core into a
> pointer pointed to the virtnet header.
> 
> Thanks.

Hard to say without seeing what is proposed, but I think
data pointer is opaque to virtio, it does not have to
point to anything specific - just !NULL.


> 
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:46 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed,  4 Sep 2024 14:10:09 +0800, Wenbo Li <liwenbo.martin@bytedance.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > Currently, the virtio-net driver will perform a pre-dma-mapping for
> > > > small or mergeable RX buffer. But for small packets, a mismatched
> > address
> > > > without VIRTNET_RX_PAD and xdp_headroom is used for unmapping.
> > >
> > > Will used virt_to_head_page(), so could you say more about it?
> > >
> > >         struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > That will result in unsynchronized buffers when SWIOTLB is enabled, for
> > > > example, when running as a TDX guest.
> > > >
> > > > This patch handles small and mergeable packets separately and fixes
> > > > the mismatched buffer address.
> > > >
> > > > Changes from v1: Use ctx to get xdp_headroom.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 295525e29a5b ("virtio_net: merge dma operations when filling
> > mergeable buffers")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wenbo Li <liwenbo.martin@bytedance.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jiahui Cen <cenjiahui@bytedance.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ying Fang <fangying.tommy@bytedance.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > index c6af18948..cbc3c0ae4 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > @@ -891,6 +891,23 @@ static void *virtnet_rq_get_buf(struct
> > receive_queue *rq, u32 *len, void **ctx)
> > > >       return buf;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +static void *virtnet_rq_get_buf_small(struct receive_queue *rq,
> > > > +                                   u32 *len,
> > > > +                                   void **ctx,
> > > > +                                   unsigned int header_offset)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     void *buf;
> > > > +     unsigned int xdp_headroom;
> > > > +
> > > > +     buf = virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(rq->vq, len, ctx);
> > > > +     if (buf) {
> > > > +             xdp_headroom = (unsigned long)*ctx;
> > > > +             virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf + VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom,
> > *len);
> > > > +     }
> > > > +
> > > > +     return buf;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  static void virtnet_rq_init_one_sg(struct receive_queue *rq, void
> > *buf, u32 len)
> > > >  {
> > > >       struct virtnet_rq_dma *dma;
> > > > @@ -2692,13 +2709,23 @@ static int virtnet_receive_packets(struct
> > virtnet_info *vi,
> > > >       int packets = 0;
> > > >       void *buf;
> > > >
> > > > -     if (!vi->big_packets || vi->mergeable_rx_bufs) {
> > > > +     if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs) {
> > > >               void *ctx;
> > > >               while (packets < budget &&
> > > >                      (buf = virtnet_rq_get_buf(rq, &len, &ctx))) {
> > > >                       receive_buf(vi, rq, buf, len, ctx, xdp_xmit,
> > stats);
> > > >                       packets++;
> > > >               }
> > > > +     } else if (!vi->big_packets) {
> > > > +             void *ctx;
> > > > +             unsigned int xdp_headroom = virtnet_get_headroom(vi);
> > > > +             unsigned int header_offset = VIRTNET_RX_PAD +
> > xdp_headroom;
> > > > +
> > > > +             while (packets < budget &&
> > > > +                    (buf = virtnet_rq_get_buf_small(rq, &len, &ctx,
> > header_offset))) {
> > > > +                     receive_buf(vi, rq, buf, len, ctx, xdp_xmit,
> > stats);
> > > > +                     packets++;
> > > > +             }
> > > >       } else {
> > > >               while (packets < budget &&
> > > >                      (buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.20.1
> > > >
> >


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-04 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-04  6:10 [PATCH v2] virtio_net: Fix mismatched buf address when unmapping for small packets Wenbo Li
2024-09-04  6:31 ` Jason Wang
2024-09-04  6:45 ` Xuan Zhuo
     [not found]   ` <CABwj4+hMwUQ+=m+XyG=66e+PUbOzOvHEsQzboB17DE+3aBHA3g@mail.gmail.com>
2024-09-04  7:30     ` [External] " Xuan Zhuo
2024-09-04  7:51       ` Wenbo Li
2024-09-04 10:57       ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240904065626-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=cenjiahui@bytedance.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=fangying.tommy@bytedance.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liwenbo.martin@bytedance.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.