Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: warn on known non-plural rust doc headers

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 04:45:49PM +0000, Patrick Miller wrote:
> Adds a check for documentation in rust file. Warns if certain known
> documentation headers are not plural.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Miller <paddymills@proton.me>
> Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1110
> 
> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 39032224d504..0e99d11eeb04 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -3900,6 +3900,14 @@ sub process {
>  			     "Avoid using '.L' prefixed local symbol names for denoting a range of code via 'SYM_*_START/END' annotations; see Documentation/core-api/asm-annotations.rst\n" . $herecurr);
>  		}
>  
> +# check that document section headers are plural in rust files
> +        if (   $realfile =~ /\.rs$/
> +            && $rawline =~ /^\+\s*\/\/\/\s+#+\s+(Example|Invariant)\s*$/ )
> +        {
> +            WARN( "RUST_DOC_HEADER",
> +                "Rust doc he
> aders should be plural\n" . $herecurr );

Something went wrong, your patch lost the tabs and it had a line wrap?

And why is Rust unique for plurals here?  What if there really is only
one example?

thanks,

greg k-h