From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Thippeswamy Havalige <thippesw@amd.com>,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com,
michal.simek@amd.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
Thippeswamy Havalige <thippesw@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add support for Versal CPM5 Root Port controller-1
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 14:15:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202409071415.6WivnBm0-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240906093148.830452-3-thippesw@amd.com>
Hi Thippeswamy,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on pci/next]
[also build test ERROR on pci/for-linus mani-mhi/mhi-next robh/for-next linus/master v6.11-rc6 next-20240906]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Thippeswamy-Havalige/dt-bindings-PCI-xilinx-cpm-Add-compatible-string-for-CPM5-controller-1/20240906-173446
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240906093148.830452-3-thippesw%40amd.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add support for Versal CPM5 Root Port controller-1
config: alpha-randconfig-r051-20240907 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240907/202409071415.6WivnBm0-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240907/202409071415.6WivnBm0-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409071415.6WivnBm0-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c: In function 'xilinx_cpm_pcie_event_flow':
>> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c:292:44: error: 'CPM5_HOST1' undeclared (first use in this function)
292 | else if (port->variant->version == CPM5_HOST1) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c:292:44: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c: In function 'xilinx_cpm_pcie_init_port':
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c:504:44: error: 'CPM5_HOST1' undeclared (first use in this function)
504 | else if (port->variant->version == CPM5_HOST1) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c: At top level:
>> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c:635:40: error: redefinition of 'cpm5_host'
635 | static const struct xilinx_cpm_variant cpm5_host = {
| ^~~~~~~~~
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c:631:40: note: previous definition of 'cpm5_host' with type 'const struct xilinx_cpm_variant'
631 | static const struct xilinx_cpm_variant cpm5_host = {
| ^~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c:636:20: error: 'CPM5_HOST1' undeclared here (not in a function)
636 | .version = CPM5_HOST1,
| ^~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c:650:26: error: 'cpm5_host1' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'cpm5_host'?
650 | .data = &cpm5_host1,
| ^~~~~~~~~~
| cpm5_host
vim +/CPM5_HOST1 +292 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c
270
271 static void xilinx_cpm_pcie_event_flow(struct irq_desc *desc)
272 {
273 struct xilinx_cpm_pcie *port = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
274 struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
275 unsigned long val;
276 int i;
277
278 chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
279 val = pcie_read(port, XILINX_CPM_PCIE_REG_IDR);
280 val &= pcie_read(port, XILINX_CPM_PCIE_REG_IMR);
281 for_each_set_bit(i, &val, 32)
282 generic_handle_domain_irq(port->cpm_domain, i);
283 pcie_write(port, val, XILINX_CPM_PCIE_REG_IDR);
284
285 if (port->variant->version == CPM5) {
286 val = readl_relaxed(port->cpm_base + XILINX_CPM_PCIE0_IR_STATUS);
287 if (val)
288 writel_relaxed(val, port->cpm_base +
289 XILINX_CPM_PCIE0_IR_STATUS);
290 }
291
> 292 else if (port->variant->version == CPM5_HOST1) {
293 val = readl_relaxed(port->cpm_base + XILINX_CPM_PCIE1_IR_STATUS);
294 if (val)
295 writel_relaxed(val, port->cpm_base +
296 XILINX_CPM_PCIE1_IR_STATUS);
297 }
298
299 /*
300 * XILINX_CPM_PCIE_MISC_IR_STATUS register is mapped to
301 * CPM SLCR block.
302 */
303 val = readl_relaxed(port->cpm_base + XILINX_CPM_PCIE_MISC_IR_STATUS);
304 if (val)
305 writel_relaxed(val,
306 port->cpm_base + XILINX_CPM_PCIE_MISC_IR_STATUS);
307
308 chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
309 }
310
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-07 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-06 9:31 [PATCH 0/2] Add support for CPM5 controller-1 Thippeswamy Havalige
2024-09-06 9:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add compatible string " Thippeswamy Havalige
2024-09-06 9:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 10:43 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2024-09-06 10:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 10:50 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2024-09-06 12:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-11 4:54 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2024-09-06 9:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add support for Versal CPM5 Root Port controller-1 Thippeswamy Havalige
2024-09-06 9:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 19:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-12 9:38 ` Havalige, Thippeswamy
2024-09-07 6:15 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-09-07 9:00 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-07 10:01 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202409071415.6WivnBm0-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thippesw@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.