From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Steve Jeong <how2soft@gmail.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com>
Subject: [tobetter:odroid-6.6.y 41/82] drivers/char/aml-gpiomem.c:129:22: error: call to undeclared function 'phys_mem_access_prot'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 02:40:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202409080228.5faeeBw8-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://github.com/tobetter/linux odroid-6.6.y
head: c970a63609188f53cf758a3dcd395e777150a29a
commit: 5e7a0fcf547e3b4f54e37972019abef8e78192a7 [41/82] ODROID-N2/C4: char: Add /dev/gpiomem device
config: s390-randconfig-002-20240907 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240908/202409080228.5faeeBw8-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240908/202409080228.5faeeBw8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409080228.5faeeBw8-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/char/aml-gpiomem.c:55:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
#define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
^
In file included from drivers/char/aml-gpiomem.c:55:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
#define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
^
In file included from drivers/char/aml-gpiomem.c:55:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> drivers/char/aml-gpiomem.c:129:22: error: call to undeclared function 'phys_mem_access_prot'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
vma->vm_page_prot = phys_mem_access_prot(file, vma->vm_pgoff,
^
drivers/char/aml-gpiomem.c:129:20: error: assigning to 'pgprot_t' from incompatible type 'int'
vma->vm_page_prot = phys_mem_access_prot(file, vma->vm_pgoff,
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
12 warnings and 2 errors generated.
vim +/phys_mem_access_prot +129 drivers/char/aml-gpiomem.c
112
113 static int aml_gpiomem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
114 {
115 int gpio_area = 0;
116 unsigned long start = vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
117 unsigned long end = start + vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
118
119 while (gpio_area < inst->gpio_area_count) {
120 if ((inst->gpio_regs_phys[gpio_area].start >= start) &&
121 (inst->gpio_regs_phys[gpio_area].end <= end))
122 goto found;
123 gpio_area++;
124 }
125
126 return -EACCES;
127
128 found:
> 129 vma->vm_page_prot = phys_mem_access_prot(file, vma->vm_pgoff,
130 vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
131 vma->vm_page_prot);
132
133 vma->vm_ops = &aml_gpiomem_vm_ops;
134
135 if (remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
136 vma->vm_pgoff,
137 vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
138 vma->vm_page_prot)) {
139 return -EAGAIN;
140 }
141
142 return 0;
143 }
144
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2024-09-07 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202409080228.5faeeBw8-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=how2soft@gmail.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tobetter@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.