From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Angelo Dureghello" <adureghello@baylibre.com>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Olivier Moysan" <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] iio: dac: ad3552r: add axi platform driver
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 16:49:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240908164940.7c4ffb8a@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b289a789-0440-4c1f-9f75-6d7e8e04189d@baylibre.com>
On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:40:11 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> On 9/5/24 10:17 AM, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
>
> ...
One reply to a comment David made.
Jonathan
>
> > + */
> > + if (st->single_channel)
> > + clk_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(clk_rate, 4);
> > + else
> > + clk_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(clk_rate, 8);
> > +
>
> Having the sample rate depend on how many channels are enabled in
> the buffer seems a bit odd. Sampling frequency is not strictly
> defined in IIO, so I think it would be fine to always return the
> same value no matter how many channels are enabled.
>
> We will just need to document that the sampling frequency is the
> rate per sample, not per channel. So if two channels are enabled,
> the effective sampling rate per channel is 1/2 of the sampling
> rate reported by the sysfs attribute.
There is an oddity around this that we've never cleared up fully.
In my head at least if there is a single sampling_frequency it
applies to 'scans', not individual channel reads (so would change
with the number of channels enabled). If there
is a per channel attribute we do have documentation:
What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_voltageX_sampling_frequency
What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_powerY_sampling_frequency
What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_currentZ_sampling_frequency
KernelVersion: 5.20
Contact: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Description:
Some devices have separate controls of sampling frequency for
individual channels. If multiple channels are enabled in a scan,
then the sampling_frequency of the scan may be computed from the
per channel sampling frequencies.
For many devices the sampling frequency isn't down to each sample taking
N microsecs and them running back to back, it is instead a function of
a periodic sampling start for samples that take the same time whatever
the sampling frequency. Also for simultaneous sampling ADCs it is never
channel dependent.
So I think if you want to avoid the confusion, make your device fall into
the description above and provide a per channel attribute rather
than shared_by_all.
Or keep it as things stand and have it halve when you double the channels.
>
> > + *val = clk_rate;
> > +
> > + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > + }
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-08 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 15:17 [PATCH v2 0/9] iio: add support for the ad3552r AXI DAC IP Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: iio: dac: ad3552r: add io-backend property Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 16:28 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-09-05 19:51 ` David Lechner
2024-09-08 12:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-09 11:39 ` Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-09 19:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-09 12:46 ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-09 14:03 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-09 16:06 ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-10 8:12 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-09 17:19 ` David Lechner
2024-09-09 17:38 ` David Lechner
2024-09-10 8:16 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-11 8:45 ` Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-11 19:28 ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] iio: backend: extend features Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-08 12:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-09 11:58 ` Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] iio: backend adi-axi-dac: " Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-08 15:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-08 15:40 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] iio: backend adi-axi-dac: add registering of child fdt node Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 19:19 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 5:42 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-06 13:52 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 7:08 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-08 12:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-09 7:53 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add ad3552r axi-dac compatible Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 16:28 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-09-05 21:08 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 7:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 9:11 ` Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-06 9:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 11:53 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-06 12:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 13:52 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-06 14:04 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 16:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 16:42 ` David Lechner
2024-09-06 16:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-06 16:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] iio: dac: ad3552r: changes to use FIELD_PREP Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 20:59 ` David Lechner
2024-09-08 15:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-08 15:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] iio: dac: ad3552r: extract common code (no changes in behavior intended) Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-08 15:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-08 15:53 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] iio: dac: ad3552r: add axi platform driver Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 20:40 ` David Lechner
2024-09-08 15:49 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-09-09 9:00 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-08 16:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-08 16:28 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-09-09 13:35 ` Nuno Sá
2024-09-05 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] iio: ABI: add DAC sysfs synchronous_mode parameter Angelo Dureghello
2024-09-05 19:14 ` David Lechner
2024-09-08 12:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-09-05 19:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] iio: add support for the ad3552r AXI DAC IP David Lechner
2024-09-06 9:07 ` Conor Dooley
2024-09-06 9:44 ` Angelo Dureghello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240908164940.7c4ffb8a@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=adureghello@baylibre.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.