All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/24] KVM: arm64: Extend masking facility to arbitrary registers
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:51:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240911135151.401193-9-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240911135151.401193-1-maz@kernel.org>

We currently only use the masking (RES0/RES1) facility for VNCR
registers, as they are memory-based and thus easy to sanitise.

But we could apply the same thing to other registers if we:

- split the sanitisation from __VNCR_START__
- apply the sanitisation when reading from a HW register

This involves a new "marker" in the vcpu_sysreg enum, which
defines the point at which the sanitisation applies (the VNCR
registers being of course after this marker).

Whle we are at it, rename kvm_vcpu_sanitise_vncr_reg() to
kvm_vcpu_apply_reg_masks(), which is vaguely more explicit,
and harden set_sysreg_masks() against setting masks for
random registers...

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 19 +++++++++++++------
 arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c           | 12 ++++++++----
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 5265a1a929514..bb65da14963d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
 
 	u64 ctr_el0;
 
-	/* Masks for VNCR-baked sysregs */
+	/* Masks for VNCR-backed and general EL2 sysregs */
 	struct kvm_sysreg_masks	*sysreg_masks;
 
 	/*
@@ -401,6 +401,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info {
 	r = __VNCR_START__ + ((VNCR_ ## r) / 8),	\
 	__after_##r = __MAX__(__before_##r - 1, r)
 
+#define MARKER(m)				\
+	m, __after_##m = m - 1
+
 enum vcpu_sysreg {
 	__INVALID_SYSREG__,   /* 0 is reserved as an invalid value */
 	MPIDR_EL1,	/* MultiProcessor Affinity Register */
@@ -481,7 +484,11 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
 	CNTHV_CTL_EL2,
 	CNTHV_CVAL_EL2,
 
-	__VNCR_START__,	/* Any VNCR-capable reg goes after this point */
+	/* Anything from this can be RES0/RES1 sanitised */
+	MARKER(__SANITISED_REG_START__),
+
+	/* Any VNCR-capable reg goes after this point */
+	MARKER(__VNCR_START__),
 
 	VNCR(SCTLR_EL1),/* System Control Register */
 	VNCR(ACTLR_EL1),/* Auxiliary Control Register */
@@ -537,7 +544,7 @@ struct kvm_sysreg_masks {
 	struct {
 		u64	res0;
 		u64	res1;
-	} mask[NR_SYS_REGS - __VNCR_START__];
+	} mask[NR_SYS_REGS - __SANITISED_REG_START__];
 };
 
 struct kvm_cpu_context {
@@ -977,13 +984,13 @@ static inline u64 *___ctxt_sys_reg(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, int r)
 
 #define ctxt_sys_reg(c,r)	(*__ctxt_sys_reg(c,r))
 
-u64 kvm_vcpu_sanitise_vncr_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *, enum vcpu_sysreg);
+u64 kvm_vcpu_apply_reg_masks(const struct kvm_vcpu *, enum vcpu_sysreg, u64);
 #define __vcpu_sys_reg(v,r)						\
 	(*({								\
 		const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = &(v)->arch.ctxt;	\
 		u64 *__r = __ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, (r));			\
-		if (vcpu_has_nv((v)) && (r) >= __VNCR_START__)		\
-			*__r = kvm_vcpu_sanitise_vncr_reg((v), (r));	\
+		if (vcpu_has_nv((v)) && (r) >= __SANITISED_REG_START__)	\
+			*__r = kvm_vcpu_apply_reg_masks((v), (r), *__r);\
 		__r;							\
 	}))
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index 133cc2f9530df..fd9ddd0d31400 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -909,15 +909,15 @@ static void limit_nv_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm)
 	kvm_set_vm_id_reg(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, val);
 }
 
-u64 kvm_vcpu_sanitise_vncr_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum vcpu_sysreg sr)
+u64 kvm_vcpu_apply_reg_masks(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			     enum vcpu_sysreg sr, u64 v)
 {
-	u64 v = ctxt_sys_reg(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, sr);
 	struct kvm_sysreg_masks *masks;
 
 	masks = vcpu->kvm->arch.sysreg_masks;
 
 	if (masks) {
-		sr -= __VNCR_START__;
+		sr -= __SANITISED_REG_START__;
 
 		v &= ~masks->mask[sr].res0;
 		v |= masks->mask[sr].res1;
@@ -928,7 +928,11 @@ u64 kvm_vcpu_sanitise_vncr_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum vcpu_sysreg sr)
 
 static void set_sysreg_masks(struct kvm *kvm, int sr, u64 res0, u64 res1)
 {
-	int i = sr - __VNCR_START__;
+	int i = sr - __SANITISED_REG_START__;
+
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(sr));
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sr < __SANITISED_REG_START__);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sr >= NR_SYS_REGS);
 
 	kvm->arch.sysreg_masks->mask[i].res0 = res0;
 	kvm->arch.sysreg_masks->mask[i].res1 = res1;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index e4ce1e1c19bef..8fce896685b9c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -181,6 +181,9 @@ u64 vcpu_read_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
 
 		/* Get the current version of the EL1 counterpart. */
 		WARN_ON(!__vcpu_read_sys_reg_from_cpu(el1r, &val));
+		if (reg >= __SANITISED_REG_START__)
+			val = kvm_vcpu_apply_reg_masks(vcpu, reg, val);
+
 		return val;
 	}
 
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-11 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-11 13:51 [PATCH v3 00/24] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 support to FEAT_S1PIE Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 01/24] arm64: Drop SKL0/SKL1 from TCR2_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2024-09-12 10:22   ` Joey Gouly
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 02/24] arm64: Remove VNCR definition for PIRE0_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 03/24] arm64: Add encoding " Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 04/24] KVM: arm64: nv: Add missing EL2->EL1 mappings in get_el2_to_el1_mapping() Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 05/24] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle CNTHCTL_EL2 specially Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 06/24] KVM: arm64: nv: Save/Restore vEL2 sysregs Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 07/24] KVM: arm64: Correctly access TCR2_EL1, PIR_EL1, PIRE0_EL1 with VHE Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/24] arm64: Define ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.HAFDBS advertising FEAT_HAFT Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/24] KVM: arm64: Add TCR2_EL2 to the sysreg arrays Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 11/24] KVM: arm64: Sanitise TCR2_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 12/24] KVM: arm64: Add save/restore for TCR2_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 13/24] KVM: arm64: Add PIR{,E0}_EL2 to the sysreg arrays Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 14/24] KVM: arm64: Add save/restore for PIR{,E0}_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 15/24] KVM: arm64: Handle PIR{,E0}_EL2 traps Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 16/24] KVM: arm64: Sanitise ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1 Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 17/24] KVM: arm64: Add AT fast-path support for S1PIE Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 18/24] KVM: arm64: Split S1 permission evaluation into direct and hierarchical parts Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 14:15   ` Joey Gouly
2024-09-11 15:38     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 15:51       ` Joey Gouly
2024-09-11 16:10         ` Marc Zyngier
2024-09-12 10:04           ` Joey Gouly
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 19/24] KVM: arm64: Disable hierarchical permissions when S1PIE is enabled Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 20/24] KVM: arm64: Implement AT S1PIE support Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 21/24] KVM: arm64: Define helper for EL2 registers with custom visibility Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 22/24] KVM: arm64: Hide TCR2_EL1 from userspace when disabled for guests Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 23/24] KVM: arm64: Hide S1PIE registers " Marc Zyngier
2024-09-11 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] KVM: arm64: Rely on visibility to let PIR*_ELx/TCR2_ELx UNDEF Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240911135151.401193-9-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.