Re: [PATCH stable-6.10 regression] Revert "soundwire: stream: fix programming slave ports for non-continous port maps"

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 04:02:29PM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 10/09/2024 15:40, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > The prop->src_dpn_prop and prop.sink_dpn_prop is allocated for the _number_
> > of ports and it is forced as 0 index based.
> > 
> > The original code was correct while the change to walk the bits and use
> > their position as index into the arrays is not correct.
> > 
> > For exmple we can have the prop.source_ports=0x2, which means we have one
> > port, but the prop.src_dpn_prop[1] is accessing outside of the allocated
> > memory.
> > 
> > This reverts commit 6fa78e9c41471fe43052cd6feba6eae1b0277ae3.
> 
> I just noticed that Krzysztof already sent the revert patch but it is
> not picked up for stable-6.10.y
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240909164746.136629-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Is this in Linus's tree yet?  That's what we are waiting for.

> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.10.y
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The reverted patch causes major regression on soundwire causing all audio
> > to fail.
> > Interestingly the patch is only in 6.10.8 and 6.10.9, not in mainline or linux-next.

Really?  Commit ab8d66d132bc ("soundwire: stream: fix programming slave
ports for non-continous port maps") is in Linus's tree, why isn't it
being reverted there first?

confused,

greg k-h