All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 10/10] blk-integrity: improved sg segment mapping
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:46:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240912074613.GA8409@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZuImbgYqqZzLZkho@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 05:23:26PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 01:12:40PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > @@ -102,6 +103,12 @@ int blk_rq_map_integrity_sg(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
> > +	 */
> > +	BUG_ON(segments > blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq));
> 
> Doh, this was mixed up with the copy from blk_rq_map_sg. It should say:
> 
> 	BUG_ON(segments > blk_rq_nr_integrity_segments(rq));
> 
> Question though, blk_rq_map_sg uses WARN and scsi used BUG for this
> check. But if the condition is true, a buffer overrun occured. So BUG,
> right?

That would be my preference, unless we manage to add a error return
condition.  Note that Linus seems to be on his weird anti-BUG crusade
again, though.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-12  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-11 20:12 [PATCHv4 00/10] block integrity merging and counting Keith Busch
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 01/10] blk-mq: unconditional nr_integrity_segments Keith Busch
2024-09-12  7:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-13  1:47   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 02/10] blk-mq: set the nr_integrity_segments from bio Keith Busch
2024-09-13  1:47   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 03/10] blk-integrity: properly account for segments Keith Busch
2024-09-13  1:48   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 04/10] blk-integrity: consider entire bio list for merging Keith Busch
2024-09-12  7:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 05/10] block: provide a request helper for user integrity segments Keith Busch
2024-09-12  7:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-13  1:50   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-09-13 12:33   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 06/10] block: provide helper for nr_integrity_segments Keith Busch
2024-09-12  7:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-13  1:52     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-09-13 12:35   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 07/10] scsi: use request helper to get integrity segments Keith Busch
2024-09-13  1:53   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-09-13 12:35   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 08/10] nvme-rdma: " Keith Busch
2024-09-13  1:54   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-09-13 12:37   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 09/10] block: unexport blk_rq_count_integrity_sg Keith Busch
2024-09-13  1:54   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-09-11 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 10/10] blk-integrity: improved sg segment mapping Keith Busch
2024-09-11 23:23   ` Keith Busch
2024-09-12  7:46     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-09-12  7:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-13  2:00   ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-09-13  3:45   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240912074613.GA8409@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.