From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kaihengfeng@gmail.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:57:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240912165709.GA674430@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAd53p7vP8TcPj=u5TTuPMXFaWW15hwpJdECCprvXGBhigKD6Q@mail.gmail.com>
[+cc Rafael]
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:00:43AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:05 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:24:11PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > > Some laptops wake up after poweroff when HP Thunderbolt Dock G4 is
> > > connected.
> > >
> > > The following error message can be found during shutdown:
> > > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:09:04.0
> > > pcieport 0000:09:04.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
> > > pcieport 0000:09:04.0: device [8086:0b26] error status/mask=00000080/00002000
> > > pcieport 0000:09:04.0: [ 7] BadDLLP
> > >
> > > Calling aer_remove() during shutdown can quiesce the error message,
> > > however the spurious wakeup still happens.
> > >
> > > The issue won't happen if the device is in D3 before system shutdown, so
> > > putting device to low power state before shutdown to solve the issue.
> > >
> > > I don't have a sniffer so this is purely guesswork, however I believe
> > > putting device to low power state it's the right thing to do.
> >
> > My objection here is that we don't have an explanation of why this
> > should matter or a pointer to any spec language about this situation,
> > so it feels a little bit random.
>
> I have the same feeling too. The PCIe spec doesn't specify what's the
> correct power state for shutdown.
> So we can only "logically" think the software should put devices to
> low power state during shutdown.
>
> > I suppose the problem wouldn't happen if AER interrupts were disabled?
> > We already do disable them in aer_suspend(), but maybe that's not used
> > in the shutdown path?
>
> That was my first thought, so I modified pcie_port_shutdown_service()
> to disable AER interrupt.
> That approach didn't work though.
>
> > My understanding is that .shutdown() should turn off device interrupts
> > and stop DMA. So maybe we need an aer_shutdown() that disables
> > interrupts?
>
> Logically we should do that. However that approach doesn't solve this issue.
I'm not completely clear on the semantics of the .shutdown()
interface. The doc at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/device/driver.h?id=v6.10#n73
says "@shutdown: Called at shut-down time to quiesce the device"
Turning off device interrupts and DMA *would* fit within the idea of
quiescing the device. Does that also include changing the device
power state? I dunno. The power state isn't *mentioned* in the
.shutdown() context, while it *is* mentioned for .suspend().
IIUC, this patch and commit log uses "shutdown" to refer to a
system-wide *poweroff*, which is a different concept despite using the
same "shutdown" name.
So should the system poweroff procedure use .suspend()? Should it use
both .shutdown() and .suspend()? I think it only uses .shutdown()
today:
kernel_power_off
kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_POWER_OFF)
device_shutdown
while (!list_empty(&devices_kset->list))
dev->bus->shutdown(dev)
pci_device_shutdown
There are several driver .shutdown() methods that do things like this:
e1000_shutdown
if (system_state == SYSTEM_POWER_OFF)
pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot)
Maybe that's the right thing and should be done by the PCI core, which
is similar to what you propose here. But I think it muddies the
definition of .shutdown() a bit by mixing in power management stuff.
> > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219036
> > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > > index af2996d0d17f..4c6f66f3eb54 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > > @@ -510,6 +510,14 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
> > > if (drv && drv->shutdown)
> > > drv->shutdown(pci_dev);
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * If driver already changed device's power state, it can mean the
> > > + * wakeup setting is in place, or a workaround is used. Hence keep it
> > > + * as is.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!kexec_in_progress && pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0)
> > > + pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * If this is a kexec reboot, turn off Bus Master bit on the
> > > * device to tell it to not continue to do DMA. Don't touch
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 6:24 [PATCH] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown Kai-Heng Feng
2024-07-12 14:59 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-22 19:28 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-26 12:03 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-11 14:08 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-11 19:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-11 19:16 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-11 19:38 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-12 7:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-12 13:10 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-10-04 4:33 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2024-10-04 9:26 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-12 3:00 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-12 16:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-09-13 6:00 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-13 8:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2024-09-13 20:33 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-15 7:14 ` Mika Westerberg
2024-10-09 22:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-10 4:52 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240912165709.GA674430@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=kaihengfeng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.