All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Erni Sri Satya Vennela <ernis@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
	decui@microsoft.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com,
	ahmed.zaki@intel.com, colin.i.king@gmail.com,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mana: Add get_link and get_link_ksettings in ethtool
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:23:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240913202347.2b74f75e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1726127083-28538-1-git-send-email-ernis@linux.microsoft.com>

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:44:43 -0700 Erni Sri Satya Vennela wrote:
> Add support for the ethtool get_link and get_link_ksettings
> operations. Display standard port information using ethtool.

Any reason why? Sometimes people add this callback for virtual
devices to expose some approximate speed, but you're not reporting
speed, so I'm curious.

> +static int mana_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *ndev,
> +				   struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd)
> +{
> +	cmd->base.duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;

make sense

> +	cmd->base.autoneg = AUTONEG_ENABLE;

what's the point of autoneg if we show no link info?
DISABLE seems more suitable

> +	cmd->base.port = PORT_DA;

Any reason why DA? I'd think PORT_OTHER may be better?
-- 
pw-bot: cr

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-14  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-12  7:44 [PATCH] net: mana: Add get_link and get_link_ksettings in ethtool Erni Sri Satya Vennela
2024-09-14  3:23 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-09-17 14:35   ` Haiyang Zhang
2024-09-17 15:04     ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-17 20:34       ` Haiyang Zhang
2024-09-19  7:45         ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-20 12:49           ` Erni Sri Satya Vennela

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240913202347.2b74f75e@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=ahmed.zaki@intel.com \
    --cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ernis@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.