All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kernel@openeuler.org, Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [openeuler:OLK-6.6 1870/13938] drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:852:19: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct fb_ctr_pair'
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:09:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202409141237.GV6bZXKN-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

Hi Zeng,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree:   https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6
head:   292de9750592324fa903dc314670538f50b4c19a
commit: 12f136b2134d4ded731c3ef23ac08c85b9c0b1fa [1870/13938] cpufreq: CPPC: Keep the target core awake when reading its cpufreq rate
config: arm64-randconfig-001-20240913 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240914/202409141237.GV6bZXKN-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240914/202409141237.GV6bZXKN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409141237.GV6bZXKN-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:852:19: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct fb_ctr_pair'
           int cpu = fb_ctrs->cpu;
                     ~~~~~~~^
   drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:851:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct fb_ctr_pair'
           struct fb_ctr_pair *fb_ctrs = val;
                  ^
   drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:855:40: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct fb_ctr_pair'
           ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs->fb_ctrs_t0);
                                          ~~~~~~~^
   drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:851:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct fb_ctr_pair'
           struct fb_ctr_pair *fb_ctrs = val;
                  ^
   drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:861:41: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct fb_ctr_pair'
           return cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs->fb_ctrs_t1);
                                           ~~~~~~~^
   drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:851:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct fb_ctr_pair'
           struct fb_ctr_pair *fb_ctrs = val;
                  ^
>> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:866:21: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct fb_ctr_pair'
           struct fb_ctr_pair fb_ctrs = { .cpu = cpu, };
                              ^
   drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:866:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct fb_ctr_pair'
           struct fb_ctr_pair fb_ctrs = { .cpu = cpu, };
                  ^
   4 errors generated.


vim +852 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c

   848	
   849	static int cppc_get_perf_ctrs_pair(void *val)
   850	{
   851		struct fb_ctr_pair *fb_ctrs = val;
 > 852		int cpu = fb_ctrs->cpu;
   853		int ret;
   854	
   855		ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs->fb_ctrs_t0);
   856		if (ret)
   857			return ret;
   858	
   859		udelay(2); /* 2usec delay between sampling */
   860	
   861		return cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs->fb_ctrs_t1);
   862	}
   863	
   864	static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
   865	{
 > 866		struct fb_ctr_pair fb_ctrs = { .cpu = cpu, };
   867		struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
   868		struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = policy->driver_data;
   869		u64 delivered_perf;
   870		int ret;
   871	
   872		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
   873	
   874		if (cpu_has_amu_feat(cpu))
   875			ret = smp_call_on_cpu(cpu, cppc_get_perf_ctrs_pair,
   876					      &fb_ctrs, false);
   877		else
   878			ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs_pair(&fb_ctrs);
   879	
   880		if (ret)
   881			return 0;
   882	
   883		delivered_perf = cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(cpu_data,
   884						      &fb_ctrs.fb_ctrs_t0,
   885						      &fb_ctrs.fb_ctrs_t1);
   886	
   887		return cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, delivered_perf);
   888	}
   889	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

                 reply	other threads:[~2024-09-14  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202409141237.GV6bZXKN-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@openeuler.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.