From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2817AC133 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 07:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726299652; cv=none; b=MGikgEeZAbVgQWCNkijoDlsHI/pXLf2zy7ZvD1MP+qlVb/LceNSNnkl950W6LNAmaoKftzJMQLxPq1qG7brlHy4wP3sYdVbzB+XWoi/+mkLUxxaAU/rxg/sQWWckU8yvDwHJtt0tdlfjqDGEgbiZK3lq/jOkEsZTpK29RtQBsuU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726299652; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ht8cmc8cCbaz2kpkC2GEHfzVv1jnhpkt6M+PnqaO2XU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FUQczbf7nQT46vwNiRSYYcKP5rrWzWkFLJsGaqFf9npgf2G5RrqIGnXISYtfh/ftuE+65j2Mw3MsZWEOitJ60fnfyP3miu9ClhjQeK5OST1Jcy0xSF+yQCESi5duNAV8sSulU2chXFCWEzhRdl7PNme/97RoC5p7I4WyElYJPRs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NYXb8E7N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NYXb8E7N" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726299650; x=1757835650; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Ht8cmc8cCbaz2kpkC2GEHfzVv1jnhpkt6M+PnqaO2XU=; b=NYXb8E7NPP0c7tHrVBQg2qhMsfWzgnErprVg+H3KbUxQTXOBFH2EPLVH cgYQcA92efPu5HXjYeGYaI/po3ADcA2iBYA0DMxwuUvNWgabgFtXEVfa8 ieOxBhl2f0rOMsknPMwalA+Smc4S6uG/nTiqfssdYgVoNSPygGYVjnR/o Tue7no4+r4a/hdMQgiNbLJYzwkG4yEkWQwtRxwdgvQaEL8NztT1rV9Lkn xFHRgq/Hl8/XU71BFpaNCciDixzQudpFM351JaJgTyyk/MgyhKSWGD04F L9h3qZNNcNIhLR4JfM6sIqNgOn4+1vkdHlNgR0j2yJbhpuY2YBTnupBVu w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BwcRc5w9SfyPLDhch7iYbA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MdTKmxvVQAe1BoI2fTQvZg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11194"; a="25300228" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,228,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="25300228" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2024 00:40:50 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2D/9ZqpDRFeNZsKsLSPwMg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pv766GQQRn2AdPgDPot+Fg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,228,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="68038027" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2024 00:40:48 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1spNOg-0007VP-1L; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 07:40:46 +0000 Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 15:40:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] unwind: Introduce SFrame user space unwinding Message-ID: <202409141501.yaoIVdSI-lkp@intel.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Josh, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next] [also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core perf-tools/perf-tools linus/master v6.11-rc7 next-20240913] [cannot apply to acme/perf/core] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Josh-Poimboeuf/unwind-Introduce-generic-user-space-unwinding-interface/20240914-070619 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git perf-tools-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ca2e603ae3dcfa3e836162ed8c301fd4d9fd4058.1726268190.git.jpoimboe%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH v2 03/11] unwind: Introduce SFrame user space unwinding config: alpha-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240914/202409141501.yaoIVdSI-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240914/202409141501.yaoIVdSI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409141501.yaoIVdSI-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/init-mm.c:48:33: error: expected expression before ',' token 48 | INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm), | ^ >> mm/init-mm.c:48:33: warning: excess elements in struct initializer mm/init-mm.c:48:33: note: (near initialization for 'init_mm') vim +48 mm/init-mm.c 22 23 /* 24 * For dynamically allocated mm_structs, there is a dynamically sized cpumask 25 * at the end of the structure, the size of which depends on the maximum CPU 26 * number the system can see. That way we allocate only as much memory for 27 * mm_cpumask() as needed for the hundreds, or thousands of processes that 28 * a system typically runs. 29 * 30 * Since there is only one init_mm in the entire system, keep it simple 31 * and size this cpu_bitmask to NR_CPUS. 32 */ 33 struct mm_struct init_mm = { 34 .mm_mt = MTREE_INIT_EXT(mm_mt, MM_MT_FLAGS, init_mm.mmap_lock), 35 .pgd = swapper_pg_dir, 36 .mm_users = ATOMIC_INIT(2), 37 .mm_count = ATOMIC_INIT(1), 38 .write_protect_seq = SEQCNT_ZERO(init_mm.write_protect_seq), 39 MMAP_LOCK_INITIALIZER(init_mm) 40 .page_table_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.page_table_lock), 41 .arg_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.arg_lock), 42 .mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_mm.mmlist), 43 #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK 44 .mm_lock_seq = 0, 45 #endif 46 .user_ns = &init_user_ns, 47 .cpu_bitmap = CPU_BITS_NONE, > 48 INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm), 49 INIT_MM_SFRAME, 50 }; 51 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki