From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A4C01D014D for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 14:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726324207; cv=none; b=bUiRyjdWYAeKvez2S0SRgZ/IMtNujAOS9mbFldRaHkuAynOrIzTviOpDN/scB36xkwdKq6vzfpWwZyCzSOnf6reOlsx/UPn/K4PRixymByqqp7O4vQdLIVW42uKjo/Zvej625qw/AlJoBKTkYeZ+Ys6b8jUUul5aEDSckVrSris= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726324207; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ozQkrzLjdzG1Ci6P3bBpwo5lfrwCKL4A70+cXWZSqHw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E13xlhmL2ftJ/RGxnhrvpOVJ9Mlu24TqLANqk6cBqd2Q48tXgVzCpdilF4I6hQczTVosUYaLIqRVY9Wz+RK6wJR05s5w48eRoLk+83PFPomuX3dYYdZCCB5degV9EsH29lnPnk7UOR8l5/ktdN3lg/aoEveCGcZbGqz9n5MOK/M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=O+dFQSQr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="O+dFQSQr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726324205; x=1757860205; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ozQkrzLjdzG1Ci6P3bBpwo5lfrwCKL4A70+cXWZSqHw=; b=O+dFQSQrXOxzRmM4WI0dU8EHTu2K5+7Bf2Mi9I4RpbXPnwGRDLnWZPy0 PmlESjuIlz+7TITRV4FbaVOG2jqrzhMT5aJuG0hGL9mEeOeHvpnyTcOU+ Rd7ZjsomhN+H83uiZTwtsocvzdiot09TDy4YVLVK+19Ab0o/scDG19Fpt XGfXvsnj1xxkM85NlCOkES2ZhMXv9ks2sf5t2iYtbhRwELW+6SPyT6HNM 5LHQwrvkWPB4y2ADbRlpOQVeNHYzFdQrgF6IqGvaxoQB2rEfk1aqj2s2x fqV7pUHIfzmZTnQHyPz4CaU+TNoci87gC1BzNryDtNc2/PDOcNxAXAuuZ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: B99OcjMRSoq/8otpM5SmaQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gGXR3kqyR/SDRqcBQCt5rw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11195"; a="25312581" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,229,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="25312581" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2024 07:30:05 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: v9TBN+AXRV+jNFfzuQ6a8w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: m8DDTMFJRrGAxDLGjbLK4Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,229,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="91682814" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2024 07:30:03 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1spTmj-0007qI-28; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 14:30:01 +0000 Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 22:29:09 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Ojaswin Mujoo Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] ext4: add aligned allocation hint in mballoc Message-ID: <202409142251.Q4HzDzGM-lkp@intel.com> References: <3a17d8d55c88799a3af9a7d337f183863912e28e.1726034272.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3a17d8d55c88799a3af9a7d337f183863912e28e.1726034272.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Hi Ojaswin, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tytso-ext4/dev] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.11-rc7 next-20240913] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ojaswin-Mujoo/ext4-add-aligned-allocation-hint-in-mballoc/20240911-170427 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git dev patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3a17d8d55c88799a3af9a7d337f183863912e28e.1726034272.git.ojaswin%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [RFC 1/5] ext4: add aligned allocation hint in mballoc config: i386-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240914/202409142251.Q4HzDzGM-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240914/202409142251.Q4HzDzGM-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409142251.Q4HzDzGM-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): ld: fs/ext4/mballoc.o: in function `ext4_mb_regular_allocator': >> mballoc.c:(.text+0xde5c): undefined reference to `__umoddi3' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki