All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] iomap: remove iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:10:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240924061018.GA11071@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240924060516.GO21877@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:05:16PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Yeah, please do.  What do you think of:
> 
> "When a short write occurs, the filesystem might need to use ->iomap_end
> to remove space reservations created in ->iomap_begin." ?

Sounds good, I'll update it again.

> > > Unrelated question about iomap_write_begin: Can we get rid of the
> > > !mapping_large_folio_support if-body just prior to __iomap_get_folio?
> > > filemap_get_folio won't return large folios if
> > > !mapping_large_folio_support, so I think the separate check in iomap
> > > isn't needed anymore?
> > 
> > From the iomap POV it seems like we could (after checking no one
> > is doing something weird with len in ->get_folio).
> 
> The only user I know of is gfs2, which allocates a transaction and then
> calls iomap_get_folio with pos/len unchanged.

Yeah, so it _should_ be fine.  Not really feeling like changing it now
with all the other stuff in flight, though.  And eventually I really
want to sort out a few things in the area, like confusing
__iomap_get_folio naming for the wrapper with iomap_get_folio as
the default instance, and the fact that the get_folio and invalidation
are indirect calls right next to each other.

> 
> --D
---end quoted text---

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-24  6:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-23 15:28 fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v3 Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/10] iomap: factor out a iomap_last_written_block helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-24  5:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] iomap: remove iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 16:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-23 22:43     ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-24  5:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  6:05       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-24  6:10         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] iomap: move locking out of iomap_write_delalloc_release Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 16:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: factor out a xfs_file_write_zero_eof helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 16:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: take XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL xfs_file_write_zero_eof Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: zeroing already holds invalidate_lock Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 16:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-24  5:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support the COW fork in xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: share more code in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: set IOMAP_F_SHARED for all COW fork allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: punch delalloc extents from the COW fork for COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-25  9:19 ` fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v3 Christian Brauner
2024-09-25  9:24   ` fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v4 Christian Brauner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-24  7:40 Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 01/10] iomap: factor out a iomap_last_written_block helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 14:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 02/10] iomap: remove iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 03/10] iomap: move locking out of iomap_write_delalloc_release Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: factor out a xfs_file_write_zero_eof helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: take XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL xfs_file_write_zero_eof Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: zeroing already holds invalidate_lock Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support the COW fork in xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: share more code in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: set IOMAP_F_SHARED for all COW fork allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: punch delalloc extents from the COW fork for COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-05 15:53 ` fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v4 Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-07  5:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-07  6:28     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-07  6:46       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-07 15:20         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-08  8:59 fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08  8:59 ` [PATCH 02/10] iomap: remove iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240924061018.GA11071@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.