From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 136C213DDB9 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727257796; cv=none; b=qOzJByFE0sJpvEnDVp6/OJQcfkR5zmck8GXm0eaQrhZt0Q/4/GFoXj9L0I+uesevaEY9HGIqIul8uDw7hiPZd6ERf99MwC6eQ7eYAXP1La53RJ3zNUubziNQzn8lDhsbL7j82TTwZaD+ZrfR7469W5raSs+FJBeUOqcSpx6Tkwk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727257796; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/l/NlhIvBnsLL4fpb8SQAbZu62LcA42OxwWwj83oqZI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dgZgPU2zxTl3wB7/Znb9PKn8geV6GqsK/mQcLJ2Na3esqt70jFMNvGO8j6QVTO2ZQbCNZVGPbM/rSHUMOMxh8THlGRxxmmuYh5N1TZbsmeKEK6RY1+SnfGnRGwezI0z36sXoXXfI2NnHq+AVm0kOCBYWuKqP/17AndFgaMOfY7A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=iGOMHCcZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="iGOMHCcZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD032C4CEC3; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:49:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1727257795; bh=/l/NlhIvBnsLL4fpb8SQAbZu62LcA42OxwWwj83oqZI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iGOMHCcZS8dQ5gd/tg32Qq98GfuEixoQ9cxWby473GkhlDSYraAAO150Qu4ZKxG6W IltXBPB9vSPpOyuu9ayvlLou82m1+VWbyHMcNx9QCalLsUVY0CrlnNtecSD0MqKH7K Kx3BCVm9QQftKAMVv/Pj8RULUcUwcuO03UT+J/mM= Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:49:51 +0200 From: Greg KH To: liujing Cc: arnd@arndb.de, W_Armin@gmx.de, hkallweit1@gmail.com, jdelvare@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeprom: fix cacography of switch Message-ID: <2024092512-immovable-broker-81be@gregkh> References: <20240921103644.14667-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240921103644.14667-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com> On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 06:36:44PM +0800, liujing wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig > index 9df12399bda3..cb1c4b8e7fd3 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig > @@ -97,11 +97,11 @@ config EEPROM_DIGSY_MTC_CFG > If unsure, say N. > > config EEPROM_IDT_89HPESX > - tristate "IDT 89HPESx PCIe-swtiches EEPROM / CSR support" > + tristate "IDT 89HPESx PCIe-switches EEPROM / CSR support" > depends on I2C && SYSFS > help > Enable this driver to get read/write access to EEPROM / CSRs > - over IDT PCIe-swtich i2c-slave interface. > + over IDT PCIe-switch i2c-slave interface. > > This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module > will be called idt_89hpesx. > -- > 2.27.0 > > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line. Please read the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and resend it after adding that line. Note, the line needs to be in the body of the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the email signature. - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg, and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what a proper Subject: line should look like. - It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to match). Please read the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for how to do this correctly. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot