From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3253E49D for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727287202; cv=none; b=mfxcAGA6qMthavyzE69AcOgDmxCYoNwdkRR34d+QmMkUPWiNmlfqnhj6pvmkMTu8ZyMqkRJ5D20NqxJKPOm1HK5a1Vzd92eCDQIcpdM0+PtA1NSPg8WqkG1gqC64mIqk8wbjBc2b2OCeVFlalkqUYkoGPKWvea5oXa33Fp+4s3c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727287202; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cUd79tPAULeAAiZXzjfuxI51yQaHbOzAAxSW3djWd0Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=B0ziCWiL+EpkXHRHKSvhdDjhkL1pTR0Ejjjzmj2HkP02wGDGZXcRs9XTnV87ZeBPM+ANwpLCOwqhWAqfSUdg1FmhzYhiPJcFGHFUgLqs09vsQzcXKkxlsm2nd5E5btDA6NDHnptYOSbnsMBy9mKymZgi6VQfkjEIbovt6oIG4Nw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=Yv2j9yTd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="Yv2j9yTd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id BF309C4CEC6; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75EADC4CEC3; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:59:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.kernel.org 75EADC4CEC3 Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EE76240004; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:59:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1727287192; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RYHzDl9a5nN7rzCT3bmvtkTBk4EsY6sAXT9t7x+utyI=; b=Yv2j9yTdFYiRDNPu51ACo3Ujg5DZbB2l6f6zltX3WMUiWSMLGWzUvPMV2c0AlH0C4Nzkrx eO1sN3hhsVN/4akB/Wbx5KFT1aAFwgQZousDAqJY1yHVXegvMSytHEVO4r50+FffN0ePdY rMYV8RW9x3hlbbK+u/jAUrfvhPIPt/ui4W/QAKmocCN8s3TdptroWjoS2dWu/iU06Q4AJR 7AXfy4n3DkxEQ0aeMVhiBfWFel4w5u0kdGlP6oadan6q8KvilszHHftn31wxOFE1/GLG4D eoxDQFQF5SsR+p1u9kEf9nyhfUVI3Kz/JUC6GbK99Ng6ytfHQtefJ620h1Zs9g== Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 19:59:52 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Conor Dooley Cc: claudiu beznea , Nicolas Ferre , Daire McNamara , soc@kernel.org Subject: Re: microchip soc maintainance change proposal Message-ID: <20240925175952d2737996@mail.local> References: <20240924-overtime-entourage-bcf3d6ff8c80@spud> <6d6ab21d-44fa-491c-98f7-8a2d8ab86c62@microchip.com> <202409241424582a8b426d@mail.local> <70f1981a-5956-4abb-afd2-4321f4b21e8b@tuxon.dev> <20240925-absolute-jockey-1518cceb2884@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: soc@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240925-absolute-jockey-1518cceb2884@spud> X-GND-Sasl: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com On 25/09/2024 17:16:10+0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 10:34:10AM +0300, claudiu beznea wrote: > > > > > > On 24.09.2024 17:24, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > On 24/09/2024 16:05:45+0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > >> On 24/09/2024 at 13:46, Conor Dooley wrote: > > >>> Hey folks, > > >>> > > >>> I mentioned this to Arnd and Alexandre at LPC, and to Nicolas before > > >>> that, but I would like to propose some changes to how the Microchip soc > > >>> support is maintained - mostly affecting the riscv side of things that > > >>> I've been maintaining in my personal tree, alongside other platforms. > > >>> I'd like to propose moving those from my tree, into the at91 tree. > > >> > > >> I don't know if the "at91" naming will remain a right designation of what > > >> we're doing in the future, but well, let's stick to it for now. > > >> Some find it a little too much tight to the old Atmel brand... > > >> > > > > > > We could take this opportunity to rename the tree microchip or mchp. > > > > +1 > > I personally don't care at all about the tree being called at91 or w/e, > but I wouldn't object to a rename to either. I can whip up a mail to the > helpdesk if yous like. Yeah, I guess you can ask for the rename and be added to the list of users that can push to the repo. At the same time, you can send a patch to update the MAINTAINER entry so we can ack it. -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com