From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73E01803E for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727485736; cv=none; b=RBoNxzk4rpOJJUl4naacRAQ9YuBlsbOS8XM3n1oNSf0pHhCHaB2cLx5cT+ygLK+fMZMLPp3L9f8ua6hagrAtTCtPjBcXYxK5c6o7vbyNvxJk4ioqh61+4HkGYIJc8Uc/vcHaZt+aX5Tgbx4M5xELUvMIWWI4AAi33F13rknw3Go= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727485736; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0l68hqZIMfSRI6FwewYlmbuezmIgQFG1fgSkFvmMpXA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fVxmdzPzMg/1dvvl71xwl7sMf5LB403lAL8QdQz5K1WFz3RmHqmN12+MkWpllB7CequKQrR6uwXWsSefRcDoFexcXGXXafcQ0T+lMH4232/4Z7W1JRUyofjjGJ8l9G+ydWCUhPPowrXoU4AE+FJ3oFF6dhvNmDVCDdgyS2xx8A8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=aaySU74O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aaySU74O" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1727485735; x=1759021735; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0l68hqZIMfSRI6FwewYlmbuezmIgQFG1fgSkFvmMpXA=; b=aaySU74OfMupDS5UvaPjiSo2quQD+PXhgTBJLPNkekvjrbio2J3cwNtf /Bs8x0lweeFap8gsByuY4FQa4rZvetLojeer6j1q94onDCoXdgRsFSxwL jDz2pgZuqi2SuOmbFoeUBO4ViqBZiQqsUyEWHhUAm2XfHG9OtyJNkcsq3 aFPFUahYl4k9A1/XieTTtNS+Q3BZmPqWqCVlUpYQIDqI9V/rWYI3+2sUM rOAyXDEIN4/tl8JG4aJ9YnlwPt/f+5cbtpT/pQk3/eAFhNcgu+7+MATKC A+0FzLjTcRK9hIQgfOCqSFRaNH8/+qcmanumzyKKlS23GHvEMY31QEUtc A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hxvlh3uRRO2Vr/l8IqIqrQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UA17j7ZySRWHzOD1rS3xFA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11208"; a="37317529" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,160,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="37317529" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Sep 2024 18:08:54 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jHpG30+IQ2OnqMS7gUUMWg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: YrkUP0JaR1CC4x6bNp1ODQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,160,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="72858177" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 53e96f405c61) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2024 18:08:53 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 53e96f405c61 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1suLx5-000Mnc-1V; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:08:51 +0000 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 09:08:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Dave Jiang Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] acpi/hmat / cxl: Add extended linear cache support for CXL Message-ID: <202409280852.v8yfHiUg-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240927142108.1156362-4-dave.jiang@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240927142108.1156362-4-dave.jiang@intel.com> Hi Dave, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on driver-core/driver-core-testing] [also build test ERROR on driver-core/driver-core-next driver-core/driver-core-linus tip/x86/core tip/x86/mm v6.11] [cannot apply to rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge cxl/next linus/master cxl/pending next-20240927] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dave-Jiang/ACPICA-actbl1-h-Add-extended-linear-address-mode-to-MSCIS/20240927-222421 base: driver-core/driver-core-testing patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240927142108.1156362-4-dave.jiang%40intel.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH 3/6] acpi/hmat / cxl: Add extended linear cache support for CXL config: mips-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240928/202409280852.v8yfHiUg-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240928/202409280852.v8yfHiUg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409280852.v8yfHiUg-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/cxl/core/acpi.c: In function 'cxl_acpi_get_extended_linear_cache_size': >> drivers/cxl/core/acpi.c:10:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'hmat_get_extended_linear_cache_size'; did you mean 'cxl_acpi_get_extended_linear_cache_size'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 10 | return hmat_get_extended_linear_cache_size(backing_res, nid, size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | cxl_acpi_get_extended_linear_cache_size vim +10 drivers/cxl/core/acpi.c 6 7 int cxl_acpi_get_extended_linear_cache_size(struct resource *backing_res, 8 int nid, resource_size_t *size) 9 { > 10 return hmat_get_extended_linear_cache_size(backing_res, nid, size); -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki