Re: [PATCH 2/2] device: rust: change the name function

["gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 10:38:47AM -0300, Guilherme Giácomo Simões wrote:
> This function increments the refcount by this command
> "bindings::get_device(prt)"
> This can be confused because the function Arc::from_raw() from
> standard library, doesn't
> increment the refcount.
> Then, this function "Device::from_raw()" will be renamed for don't
> make confusion
> in the future.

Please wrap the lines here properly so they show up in a sane way :)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme Giacomo Simoes <trintaeoitogc@gmail.com>
> ---
>  rust/kernel/device.rs   | 2 +-
>  rust/kernel/firmware.rs | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/device.rs b/rust/kernel/device.rs
> index 851018eef885..ecffaff041e0 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/device.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/device.rs
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ impl Device {
>      ///
>      /// It must also be ensured that `bindings::device::release` can
> be called from any thread.

Your patch is line-wrapped and can not be applied :(

Please read the email documentation in the kernel for how to use gmail
to send patches out (hint, almost never do so, but you can use git
send-email through it), that will help you in sending changes that can
be applied.

>      /// While not officially documented, this should be the case for
> any `struct device`.
> -    pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *mut bindings::device) -> ARef<Self> {
> +    pub unsafe fn get_device(ptr: *mut bindings::device) -> ARef<Self> {

With this change, nothing broke?  Does nothing call this code yet?  I
thought the firmware interface did that, but I could be wrong...

thanks,

greg k-h