From: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Alejandro Vallejo" <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>,
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"Anthony PERARD" <anthony.perard@vates.tech>
Subject: [PATCH v6 08/11] xen/lib: Add topology generator for x86
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 13:38:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241001123807.605-9-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241001123807.605-1-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
Add a helper to populate topology leaves in the cpu policy from
threads/core and cores/package counts. It's unit-tested in
test-cpu-policy.c,
but it's not connected to the rest of the code yet.
Adds the ASSERT() macro to xen/lib/x86/private.h, as it was missing.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
---
tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h | 16 +++
xen/lib/x86/policy.c | 88 +++++++++++++++
xen/lib/x86/private.h | 4 +
4 files changed, 241 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
index 9216010b1c5d..870f7ecee0e5 100644
--- a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
+++ b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
@@ -654,6 +654,137 @@ static void test_is_compatible_failure(void)
}
}
+static void test_topo_from_parts(void)
+{
+ static const struct test {
+ unsigned int threads_per_core;
+ unsigned int cores_per_pkg;
+ struct cpu_policy policy;
+ } tests[] = {
+ {
+ .threads_per_core = 3, .cores_per_pkg = 1,
+ .policy = {
+ .x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_AMD,
+ .topo.subleaf = {
+ { .nr_logical = 3, .level = 0, .type = 1, .id_shift = 2, },
+ { .nr_logical = 1, .level = 1, .type = 2, .id_shift = 2, },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .threads_per_core = 1, .cores_per_pkg = 3,
+ .policy = {
+ .x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_AMD,
+ .topo.subleaf = {
+ { .nr_logical = 1, .level = 0, .type = 1, .id_shift = 0, },
+ { .nr_logical = 3, .level = 1, .type = 2, .id_shift = 2, },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .threads_per_core = 7, .cores_per_pkg = 5,
+ .policy = {
+ .x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_AMD,
+ .topo.subleaf = {
+ { .nr_logical = 7, .level = 0, .type = 1, .id_shift = 3, },
+ { .nr_logical = 5, .level = 1, .type = 2, .id_shift = 6, },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .threads_per_core = 2, .cores_per_pkg = 128,
+ .policy = {
+ .x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_AMD,
+ .topo.subleaf = {
+ { .nr_logical = 2, .level = 0, .type = 1, .id_shift = 1, },
+ { .nr_logical = 128, .level = 1, .type = 2,
+ .id_shift = 8, },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .threads_per_core = 3, .cores_per_pkg = 1,
+ .policy = {
+ .x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL,
+ .topo.subleaf = {
+ { .nr_logical = 3, .level = 0, .type = 1, .id_shift = 2, },
+ { .nr_logical = 3, .level = 1, .type = 2, .id_shift = 2, },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .threads_per_core = 1, .cores_per_pkg = 3,
+ .policy = {
+ .x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL,
+ .topo.subleaf = {
+ { .nr_logical = 1, .level = 0, .type = 1, .id_shift = 0, },
+ { .nr_logical = 3, .level = 1, .type = 2, .id_shift = 2, },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .threads_per_core = 7, .cores_per_pkg = 5,
+ .policy = {
+ .x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL,
+ .topo.subleaf = {
+ { .nr_logical = 7, .level = 0, .type = 1, .id_shift = 3, },
+ { .nr_logical = 35, .level = 1, .type = 2, .id_shift = 6, },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ .threads_per_core = 2, .cores_per_pkg = 128,
+ .policy = {
+ .x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL,
+ .topo.subleaf = {
+ { .nr_logical = 2, .level = 0, .type = 1, .id_shift = 1, },
+ { .nr_logical = 256, .level = 1, .type = 2,
+ .id_shift = 8, },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ };
+
+ printf("Testing topology synthesis from parts:\n");
+
+ for ( size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i )
+ {
+ const struct test *t = &tests[i];
+ struct cpu_policy actual = { .x86_vendor = t->policy.x86_vendor };
+ int rc = x86_topo_from_parts(&actual, t->threads_per_core,
+ t->cores_per_pkg);
+
+ if ( rc || memcmp(&actual.topo, &t->policy.topo, sizeof(actual.topo)) )
+ {
+#define TOPO(n, f) t->policy.topo.subleaf[(n)].f, actual.topo.subleaf[(n)].f
+ fail("FAIL[%d] - '%s %u t/c, %u c/p'\n",
+ rc,
+ x86_cpuid_vendor_to_str(t->policy.x86_vendor),
+ t->threads_per_core, t->cores_per_pkg);
+ printf(" subleaf=%u expected_n=%u actual_n=%u\n"
+ " expected_lvl=%u actual_lvl=%u\n"
+ " expected_type=%u actual_type=%u\n"
+ " expected_shift=%u actual_shift=%u\n",
+ 0,
+ TOPO(0, nr_logical),
+ TOPO(0, level),
+ TOPO(0, type),
+ TOPO(0, id_shift));
+
+ printf(" subleaf=%u expected_n=%u actual_n=%u\n"
+ " expected_lvl=%u actual_lvl=%u\n"
+ " expected_type=%u actual_type=%u\n"
+ " expected_shift=%u actual_shift=%u\n",
+ 1,
+ TOPO(1, nr_logical),
+ TOPO(1, level),
+ TOPO(1, type),
+ TOPO(1, id_shift));
+#undef TOPO
+ }
+ }
+}
+
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
printf("CPU Policy unit tests\n");
@@ -671,6 +802,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
test_is_compatible_success();
test_is_compatible_failure();
+ test_topo_from_parts();
+
if ( nr_failures )
printf("Done: %u failures\n", nr_failures);
else
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h b/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h
index f43e1a3b21e9..116b305a1d7f 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h
@@ -542,6 +542,22 @@ int x86_cpu_policies_are_compatible(const struct cpu_policy *host,
const struct cpu_policy *guest,
struct cpu_policy_errors *err);
+/**
+ * Synthesise topology information in `p` given high-level constraints
+ *
+ * Topology is given in various fields accross several leaves, some of
+ * which are vendor-specific. This function uses the policy itself to
+ * derive such leaves from threads/core and cores/package.
+ *
+ * @param p CPU policy of the domain.
+ * @param threads_per_core threads/core. Doesn't need to be a power of 2.
+ * @param cores_per_package cores/package. Doesn't need to be a power of 2.
+ * @return 0 on success; -errno on failure
+ */
+int x86_topo_from_parts(struct cpu_policy *p,
+ unsigned int threads_per_core,
+ unsigned int cores_per_pkg);
+
#endif /* !XEN_LIB_X86_POLICIES_H */
/*
diff --git a/xen/lib/x86/policy.c b/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
index 63bc96451d2c..16b09a427841 100644
--- a/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
+++ b/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
@@ -2,6 +2,94 @@
#include <xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h>
+static unsigned int order(unsigned int n)
+{
+ ASSERT(n); /* clz(0) is UB */
+
+ return 8 * sizeof(n) - __builtin_clz(n);
+}
+
+int x86_topo_from_parts(struct cpu_policy *p,
+ unsigned int threads_per_core,
+ unsigned int cores_per_pkg)
+{
+ unsigned int threads_per_pkg = threads_per_core * cores_per_pkg;
+ unsigned int apic_id_size;
+
+ if ( !p || !threads_per_core || !cores_per_pkg )
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ p->basic.max_leaf = MAX(0xb, p->basic.max_leaf);
+
+ memset(p->topo.raw, 0, sizeof(p->topo.raw));
+
+ /* thread level */
+ p->topo.subleaf[0].nr_logical = threads_per_core;
+ p->topo.subleaf[0].id_shift = 0;
+ p->topo.subleaf[0].level = 0;
+ p->topo.subleaf[0].type = 1;
+ if ( threads_per_core > 1 )
+ p->topo.subleaf[0].id_shift = order(threads_per_core - 1);
+
+ /* core level */
+ p->topo.subleaf[1].nr_logical = cores_per_pkg;
+ if ( p->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL )
+ p->topo.subleaf[1].nr_logical = threads_per_pkg;
+ p->topo.subleaf[1].id_shift = p->topo.subleaf[0].id_shift;
+ p->topo.subleaf[1].level = 1;
+ p->topo.subleaf[1].type = 2;
+ if ( cores_per_pkg > 1 )
+ p->topo.subleaf[1].id_shift += order(cores_per_pkg - 1);
+
+ apic_id_size = p->topo.subleaf[1].id_shift;
+
+ /*
+ * Contrary to what the name might seem to imply. HTT is an enabler for
+ * SMP and there's no harm in setting it even with a single vCPU.
+ */
+ p->basic.htt = true;
+ p->basic.lppp = MIN(0xff, threads_per_pkg);
+
+ switch ( p->x86_vendor )
+ {
+ case X86_VENDOR_INTEL: {
+ struct cpuid_cache_leaf *sl = p->cache.subleaf;
+
+ for ( size_t i = 0; sl->type &&
+ i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->cache.raw); i++, sl++ )
+ {
+ sl->cores_per_package = cores_per_pkg - 1;
+ sl->threads_per_cache = threads_per_core - 1;
+ if ( sl->type == 3 /* unified cache */ )
+ sl->threads_per_cache = threads_per_pkg - 1;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
+ case X86_VENDOR_HYGON:
+ /* Expose p->basic.lppp */
+ p->extd.cmp_legacy = true;
+
+ /* Clip NC to the maximum value it can hold */
+ p->extd.nc = MIN(0xff, threads_per_pkg - 1);
+
+ /* TODO: Expose leaf e1E */
+ p->extd.topoext = false;
+
+ /*
+ * Clip APIC ID to 8 bits, as that's what high core-count machines do.
+ *
+ * That's what AMD EPYC 9654 does with >256 CPUs.
+ */
+ p->extd.apic_id_size = MIN(8, apic_id_size);
+
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int x86_cpu_policies_are_compatible(const struct cpu_policy *host,
const struct cpu_policy *guest,
struct cpu_policy_errors *err)
diff --git a/xen/lib/x86/private.h b/xen/lib/x86/private.h
index 60bb82a400b7..2ec9dbee33c2 100644
--- a/xen/lib/x86/private.h
+++ b/xen/lib/x86/private.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#ifdef __XEN__
#include <xen/bitops.h>
+#include <xen/bug.h>
#include <xen/guest_access.h>
#include <xen/kernel.h>
#include <xen/lib.h>
@@ -17,6 +18,7 @@
#else
+#include <assert.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
@@ -28,6 +30,8 @@
#include <xen-tools/common-macros.h>
+#define ASSERT(x) assert(x)
+
static inline bool test_bit(unsigned int bit, const void *vaddr)
{
const char *addr = vaddr;
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-01 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-01 12:37 [PATCH v6 00/11] x86: Expose consistent topology to guests Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-01 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] lib/x86: Relax checks about policy compatibility Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-09 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 15:57 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-10 7:37 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 21:58 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-10-01 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] x86/vlapic: Move lapic migration checks to the check hooks Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-08 15:41 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 16:11 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-01 12:37 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] xen/x86: Add initial x2APIC ID to the per-vLAPIC save area Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-09 13:12 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 16:39 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-01 12:38 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] xen/x86: Add supporting code for uploading LAPIC contexts during domain create Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-09 13:28 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 16:44 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-10 7:46 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-01 12:38 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] tools/hvmloader: Retrieve (x2)APIC IDs from the APs themselves Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-09 14:03 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 17:19 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-10 7:49 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-01 12:38 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] tools/libacpi: Use LUT of APIC IDs rather than function pointer Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-09 14:25 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 17:20 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-11 16:17 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-14 6:26 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-01 12:38 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] tools/libguest: Always set vCPU context in vcpu_hvm() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-01 12:38 ` Alejandro Vallejo [this message]
2024-10-09 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] xen/lib: Add topology generator for x86 Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 17:57 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-10 7:54 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-15 13:08 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-01 12:38 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] xen/x86: Derive topologically correct x2APIC IDs from the policy Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-09 14:53 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 17:29 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-10 7:55 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-01 12:38 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] tools/libguest: Set distinct x2APIC IDs for each vCPU Alejandro Vallejo
2024-10-01 12:38 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] tools/x86: Synthesise domain topologies Alejandro Vallejo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241001123807.605-9-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com \
--to=alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@vates.tech \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.