All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yuxuanzhe@outlook.com, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] rxrpc: Fix a race between socket set up and I/O thread creation
Date: Tue,  1 Oct 2024 14:26:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241001132702.3122709-2-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241001132702.3122709-1-dhowells@redhat.com>

In rxrpc_open_socket(), it sets up the socket and then sets up the I/O
thread that will handle it.  This is a problem, however, as there's a gap
between the two phases in which a packet may come into rxrpc_encap_rcv()
from the UDP packet but we oops when trying to wake the not-yet created I/O
thread.

As a quick fix, just make rxrpc_encap_rcv() discard the packet if there's
no I/O thread yet.

A better, but more intrusive fix would perhaps be to rearrange things such
that the socket creation is done by the I/O thread.

Fixes: a275da62e8c1 ("rxrpc: Create a per-local endpoint receive queue and I/O thread")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: yuxuanzhe@outlook.com
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h  |  2 +-
 net/rxrpc/io_thread.c    | 10 ++++++++--
 net/rxrpc/local_object.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
index 80d682f89b23..d0fd37bdcfe9 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ bool rxrpc_direct_abort(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_abort_reason why,
 int rxrpc_io_thread(void *data);
 static inline void rxrpc_wake_up_io_thread(struct rxrpc_local *local)
 {
-	wake_up_process(local->io_thread);
+	wake_up_process(READ_ONCE(local->io_thread));
 }
 
 static inline bool rxrpc_protocol_error(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_abort_reason why)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/io_thread.c b/net/rxrpc/io_thread.c
index 0300baa9afcd..07c74c77d802 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/io_thread.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/io_thread.c
@@ -27,11 +27,17 @@ int rxrpc_encap_rcv(struct sock *udp_sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct sk_buff_head *rx_queue;
 	struct rxrpc_local *local = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(udp_sk);
+	struct task_struct *io_thread;
 
 	if (unlikely(!local)) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return 0;
 	}
+	io_thread = READ_ONCE(local->io_thread);
+	if (!io_thread) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return 0;
+	}
 	if (skb->tstamp == 0)
 		skb->tstamp = ktime_get_real();
 
@@ -47,7 +53,7 @@ int rxrpc_encap_rcv(struct sock *udp_sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 #endif
 
 	skb_queue_tail(rx_queue, skb);
-	rxrpc_wake_up_io_thread(local);
+	wake_up_process(io_thread);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -565,7 +571,7 @@ int rxrpc_io_thread(void *data)
 	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 	rxrpc_see_local(local, rxrpc_local_stop);
 	rxrpc_destroy_local(local);
-	local->io_thread = NULL;
+	WRITE_ONCE(local->io_thread, NULL);
 	rxrpc_see_local(local, rxrpc_local_stopped);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
index 504453c688d7..f9623ace2201 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int rxrpc_open_socket(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct net *net)
 	}
 
 	wait_for_completion(&local->io_thread_ready);
-	local->io_thread = io_thread;
+	WRITE_ONCE(local->io_thread, io_thread);
 	_leave(" = 0");
 	return 0;
 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-01 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-01 13:26 [PATCH net 0/2] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2024-10-01 13:26 ` David Howells [this message]
2024-10-01 13:28   ` [PATCH net 1/2] rxrpc: Fix a race between socket set up and I/O thread creation Eric Dumazet
2024-10-01 13:26 ` [PATCH net 2/2] rxrpc: Fix uninitialised variable in rxrpc_send_data() David Howells
2024-10-03 23:40 ` [PATCH net 0/2] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241001132702.3122709-2-dhowells@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yuxuanzhe@outlook.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.