From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CCF94DA04 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 04:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728017547; cv=none; b=KeVZQ2pJA41BItnZzAkGMWCyNiyzP3KSirsYYzpsvQyNlcFwr7n7bIIfedw71G8OeB32tztnaOrHhPoI6mZsMffgj4IFMvtrrMPleGI4BKkwCu4PxF4j3nE3h+5V5cYTzRsRdUcFGGCr5xvcDnT7mpAP2h9Aizq527f12AMEvMI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728017547; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oL7+vbTSbcplIH/Iw9YsoN8xO6a34tuwzkYwr+15dN0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IcA9moAVAdV+8KaRWSezkvZdBZAuRmUJjOezvDPFMvsVhvdS5LHiLUk9c77Vd6QoXgYOyWEAwLJG5oxX7UdRltwtnB0x/uPBlkVoFENVd9Pipn5RdzkKcezLNOMPJIN8rHjeKW072/kNCI4mNHV5ky9+qtjvzKwPt46Nfw+iqbc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=eGh9X5+R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="eGh9X5+R" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=aIE77rre37xJBZv8cY8wtIuFxPNqb/cLri2gnhgbw1Q=; b=eGh9X5+Rjac9KCug0db0AeAJY7 HyCCo09EB+6SQO8hrdSs8R0vdOdwp3aheaZMbuCjsfBTf8Bx/qRbKg71T7Cy23IrICJLbkfj8DPQX KNHpdU+OQpHFLU6+yo92s5Q6yw3Cqf3NLdbZiiFnwJrThY1Fm8zng6LofNokXXbd5A7vX/8jxYuFi 1TQ96T00R2pgE2HwE2BRqMd2MnNmIjuPIO9NPtdfBFBaCUNxdgAh3iM7OoKAbTbBYxO7UiP6ly0gb NVh4hOaV8XiP4azxKsPaInhgEoPCJMV3yaoI5tDyjCWpGoZHWv+51WGke22hs4RRvTAK1tgFL8E/h uiMikzjA==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1swaIg-00000000fni-2muU; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:52:22 +0000 Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 05:52:22 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [RFC] more close_range() fun Message-ID: <20241004045222.GO4017910@ZenIV> References: <20240816030341.GW13701@ZenIV> <20240816171925.GB504335@ZenIV> <20240816181545.GD504335@ZenIV> <20240816202657.GE504335@ZenIV> <20240816233521.GF504335@ZenIV> <20240822000004.GK504335@ZenIV> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240822000004.GK504335@ZenIV> Sender: Al Viro On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 12:35:21AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 09:26:57PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:26:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 at 11:15, Al Viro wrote: > > > > > > > > > > As in https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240812064427.240190-11-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk/? > > > > > > > > Heh. Ack. > > > > > > Variant being tested right now: > > > > No regressions, AFAICT. Pushed to > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git #proposed-fix > > (head at 8c86f1a4574d). Unless somebody objects, I'm going to take that > > into #fixes... > > Well, since nobody has objected, in #fixes it went... ... and there it sat, forgotten ;-/ Sorry, should've sent it all the way back in August, but it fell through the cracks. Rebased on top of 6.12-rc1 without changes on Sep 29, so it had replaced the older commit in -next since 20241001, no complaints about it (neither before nor after rebase), so I'll send a pull request in a few.