From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>,
Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dm-inlinecrypt: add target for inline block device encryption
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 18:48:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241004184819.GA86456@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zv-Ap9E2r1bRT2Wm@infradead.org>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 10:44:07PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 05:41:52PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> >
> > Add a new device-mapper target "dm-inlinecrypt" that is similar to
> > dm-crypt but uses the blk-crypto API instead of the regular crypto API.
> > This allows it to take advantage of inline encryption hardware such as
> > that commonly built into UFS host controllers.
> >
> > The table syntax matches dm-crypt's, but for now only a stripped-down
> > set of parameters is supported. For example, for now AES-256-XTS is the
> > only supported cipher.
>
> Maybe I'm stepping into a mine-field here, but if this simply uses
> blk-crypto to accellerate a subset of dm-crypt, why isn't dm-crypt
> simply enhanced to use blk-crypto when available?
> compatible,
>
Milan Broz (cryptsetup maintainer) has said that he prefers a separate dm
target. See
https://lore.kernel.org/dm-devel/9ef95bbc-4eee-4c00-f199-0daa3cdd03ed@gmail.com/
That was a couple years ago though, and this discussion seems to have gone
around in a circle. Maybe things have changed.
A dm-crypt extension sounds fine to me too, though keep in mind there will
eventually be inline crypto exclusive features such as hardware-wrapped keys.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-04 0:41 [RFC PATCH] dm-inlinecrypt: add target for inline block device encryption Eric Biggers
2024-10-04 5:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 18:48 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-10-04 19:21 ` Milan Broz
2024-10-07 5:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-07 8:25 ` Milan Broz
2024-10-08 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 20:17 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241004184819.GA86456@google.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_mdalam@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.