Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] rtnetlink: Add per-netns RTNL.

[Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>]

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 13:21:45 -0700
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 08:12:38 -0700 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NET_SMALL_RTNL
> > +void __rtnl_net_lock(struct net *net);
> > +void __rtnl_net_unlock(struct net *net);
> > +void rtnl_net_lock(struct net *net);
> > +void rtnl_net_unlock(struct net *net);
> > +int rtnl_net_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *a, const struct lockdep_map *b);
> > +#else
> > +#define __rtnl_net_lock(net)
> > +#define __rtnl_net_unlock(net)
> > +#define rtnl_net_lock(net) rtnl_lock()
> > +#define rtnl_net_unlock(net) rtnl_unlock()
> 
> Let's make sure net is always evaluated?
> At the very least make sure the preprocessor doesn't eat it completely
> otherwise we may end up with config-dependent "unused variable"
> warnings down the line.

Sure, what comes to mind is void casting, which I guess is old-school
style ?  Do you have any other idea or is this acceptable ?

#define __rtnl_net_lock(net) (void)(net)
#define __rtnl_net_unlock(net) (void)(net)
#define rtnl_net_lock(net)	\
	do {			\
		(void)(net);	\
		rtnl_lock();	\
	} while (0)
#define rtnl_net_unlock(net)	\
	do {			\
		(void)(net);	\
		rtnl_unlock();	\
	} while (0)