From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0089F1C687 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 02:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728094806; cv=none; b=md6WUQGYYRiyZnpX3gAGwmA9U2QPm0QTh77yhlbHd9kRG/rD08C6RVfQnFtpMDzTvcTkdGW77cyOa7x+wK7JkAE6Y6Ij3dFvMPZsHXOWM5lj3PXwRFNdM657uT0iFE34APH+OM6jhFhbPyr6VvfPfht0arZd83QBZovzp5dt7zY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728094806; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5QwICuwncs72T+klpkBkCzALP4ZytXnEbpwtQg2QZ10=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sIj/Hd8AWzxJJCYm0tsj6wkr3jXQJJhZCl56p2+bYGxIrPmk9owbR41t0TXolT/Du5oj/jBQxSk5VGc0VzrMLVnVGagjFyYjbr8Uyq11kFrlVouSiIomWJkkuS4/4yXwtY+54lLZsS1CYSvD9IjKmmM5di+iCjqI8LHyWuD0UMs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=MJbayUMX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="MJbayUMX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1728094802; bh=5QwICuwncs72T+klpkBkCzALP4ZytXnEbpwtQg2QZ10=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MJbayUMXOVLUhEwtEJaoRgqb7xZ6qWIa7cfm5CeS5d1I9uVRmqxoi1L+NPfdtpNVw 9AwciP2G/+IQTi7drsu6Mp5Wy+toznDLR2h9vkQQmEjoiAeCr/vJJk2ZqidTVuRyEd P2y6hWBJGCvN3neStJanric2O0J1aNbvD8/M1fJTLJ9LwgjIRJ2znsH0vqrwH1XwR4 bgXGg62igm3a1oOHTYgEvYlqU4nYyuwdZpVFhDhQsfSl2zy2ZuC4UqJfJNC5XQFgg6 cdqcn7XzMM1/sespTE9nVl59vMDegIx8s9oJWJEe71uXyfQX35qEMsvv4MDajU0BYL +4tvTt0Qbp8mg== Received: from noise.lan (unknown [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad5d:8e00::197]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: vivek) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C81C217E0F84 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 04:20:02 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Vivek=20Das=C2=A0Mohapatra?= To: iwd@lists.linux.dev Subject: RFC: Be more lenient about duplicate IEs with identical payloads Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 03:19:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20241005021929.2075817-1-vivek@collabora.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <6dbd0686-f054-4c16-bf84-0e383baefdc9@collabora.com> References: <6dbd0686-f054-4c16-bf84-0e383baefdc9@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iwd@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I think these patches do the right thing: - duplicate IEs with identical payloads don't count as validation failures - the duplicate-IE test data has been altered to make the duplicate IE have differeing payloads so that test still passes