Re: [PATCH 0/7] refactor kvargs test

[Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>]

On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:53:18 +0000
Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com> wrote:

> When developing patchset [1], I found the kvargs test is hard to 
> understand when tried to add some testcase.
> 
> So refactor kvargs by:
> 1. introduce UT suite framework.
> 2. extract big test_valid_kvargs() to five part.
> 
> And add myself for voluntary maintenance of the kvargs library.
> 
> Note: to ensure patch independenct, new API which in patchset [1]
> are not included in this patchset.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20231103073811.13196-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com/
> 
> Chengwen Feng (7):
>   app/test: introduce UT suite framework for kvargs
>   app/test: extract basic token count testcase for kvargs
>   app/test: extract without keys testcase for kvargs
>   app/test: extract with keys testcase for kvargs
>   app/test: extract parse list value testcase for kvargs
>   app/test: extract parse empty elements testcase for kvargs
>   maintainers: update for kvargs library
> 
>  MAINTAINERS            |   1 +
>  app/test/test_kvargs.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
> 

Looks good and still applies clean

Series-Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org.