From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Clarify safety of allowing TLBI unmaps to reschedule
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:42:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007164256.1795250-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007164256.1795250-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
There's been a decent amount of attention around unmaps of nested MMUs,
and TLBI handling is no exception to this. Add a comment clarifying why
it is safe to reschedule during a TLBI unmap, even without a reference
on the MMU in progress.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index e0c7cc16466e..b773d107cd35 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2955,6 +2955,29 @@ union tlbi_info {
static void s2_mmu_unmap_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
const union tlbi_info *info)
{
+ /*
+ * The unmap operation is allowed to drop the MMU lock and block, which
+ * means that @mmu could be used for a different context than the one
+ * currently being invalidated.
+ *
+ * This behavior is still safe, as:
+ *
+ * 1) The vCPU that recycled the MMU is responsible for invalidating
+ * the entire MMU before reusing it, which still honors the intent
+ * of a TLBI.
+ *
+ * 2) Until the guest TLBI instruction is 'retired' (i.e. increment PC
+ * and ERET to the guest), other vCPUs are allowed to use stale
+ * translations.
+ *
+ * 3) Accidentally unmapping an unrelated MMU context is nonfatal, and
+ * at worst may cause more aborts for shadow stage-2 fills.
+ *
+ * Dropping the MMU lock also implies that shadow stage-2 fills could
+ * happen behind the back of the TLBI. This is still safe, though, as
+ * the L1 needs to put its stage-2 in a consistent state before doing
+ * the TLBI.
+ */
kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, info->range.start, info->range.size, true);
}
@@ -3050,6 +3073,10 @@ static void s2_mmu_unmap_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
max_size = compute_tlb_inval_range(mmu, info->ipa.addr);
base_addr &= ~(max_size - 1);
+ /*
+ * See comment in s2_mmu_unmap_range() for why this is allowed to
+ * reschedule.
+ */
kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, base_addr, max_size, true);
}
--
2.47.0.rc0.187.ge670bccf7e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-07 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-07 16:42 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Fixes for stage-2 MMU recycling Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Keep reference on stage-2 MMU when scheduled out Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 18:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-07 19:01 ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 19:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-07 21:22 ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 22:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Do not block when unmapping stage-2 if disallowed Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Punt stage-2 recycling to a vCPU request Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 19:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-10-07 19:16 ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 16:42 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-10-07 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Clarify safety of allowing TLBI unmaps to reschedule Sean Christopherson
2024-10-07 19:20 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241007164256.1795250-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.