All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:40:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007174049.30e25d59@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY1PR18MB6109226C644CB5A7215695BFDDA32@BY1PR18MB6109.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:09:53 +0000
Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com> wrote:

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> >Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 12:14 PM
> >To: dev@dpdk.org
> >Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> >Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> >Subject: [PATCH v6 0/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch
> >
> >This patch series adds a validation in checkpatch tool to check if tracepoint is
> >present in any new function added in ethdev, eventdev cryptodev and
> >mempool library.  
> 
> Please let me know if this patch series can be merged in DPDK or if there are any comments.

Not sure why the patch got ignored.
Perhaps if check-tracepoint was run first against existing code; add to check-patch later.

And the skip list is empty, is that right? is all of existing cryptodev ethdev ... ok now?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-08  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-12  9:23 [PATCH] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 11:45 ` [PATCH v2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 13:08   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-12 15:16     ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 16:19       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-15 12:58   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-15 12:58     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] devtools: move build symbol map function Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-15 12:58     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2022-11-02  4:08     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58     ` [PATCH v4 " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] devtools: move build symbol map function Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-07 12:05       ` [PATCH v5 0/1] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-07 12:05         ` [PATCH v5 1/1] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-05-18 13:45           ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-05-18 15:33             ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-21 13:53               ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-08-21 14:46                 ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-30 16:23                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-08-30 18:38                     ` Morten Brørup
2023-09-01  2:32                       ` Jerin Jacob
2023-09-01  7:28                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-14 13:15                           ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-28 13:18         ` [PATCH v5 0/1] " Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-28 14:07           ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-28 15:55             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-30  5:56               ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-30  8:40                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-30 13:16                   ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43         ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43           ` [PATCH v6 1/2] devtools: move build map changes function Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43           ` [PATCH v6 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2024-07-17 12:09           ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2024-10-08  0:40             ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-10-09  6:03               ` [EXTERNAL] " Ankur Dwivedi
2024-10-09 15:05                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-21 14:06                   ` Ankur Dwivedi
2024-11-05  7:06                     ` Ankur Dwivedi
2024-11-20 15:33                       ` Ankur Dwivedi
2026-03-31  3:46           ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241007174049.30e25d59@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.