From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
almasrymina@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, donald.hunter@gmail.com,
corbet@lwn.net, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
kory.maincent@bootlin.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, danieller@nvidia.com,
hengqi@linux.alibaba.com, ecree.xilinx@gmail.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
ahmed.zaki@intel.com, paul.greenwalt@intel.com,
rrameshbabu@nvidia.com, idosch@nvidia.com,
asml.silence@gmail.com, kaiyuanz@google.com, willemb@google.com,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, dw@davidwei.uk,
sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, bcreeley@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] net: ethtool: add support for configuring tcp-data-split-thresh
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:33:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241008113314.243f7c36@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003160620.1521626-4-ap420073@gmail.com>
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 16:06:16 +0000 Taehee Yoo wrote:
> The tcp-data-split-thresh option configures the threshold value of
> the tcp-data-split.
> If a received packet size is larger than this threshold value, a packet
> will be split into header and payload.
> The header indicates TCP header, but it depends on driver spec.
> The bnxt_en driver supports HDS(Header-Data-Split) configuration at
> FW level, affecting TCP and UDP too.
> So, like the tcp-data-split option, If tcp-data-split-thresh is set,
> it affects UDP and TCP packets.
>
> The tcp-data-split-thresh has a dependency, that is tcp-data-split
> option. This threshold value can be get/set only when tcp-data-split
> option is enabled.
>
> Example:
> # ethtool -G <interface name> tcp-data-split-thresh <value>
>
> # ethtool -G enp14s0f0np0 tcp-data-split on tcp-data-split-thresh 256
> # ethtool -g enp14s0f0np0
> Ring parameters for enp14s0f0np0:
> Pre-set maximums:
> ...
> TCP data split thresh: 256
> Current hardware settings:
> ...
> TCP data split: on
> TCP data split thresh: 256
>
> The tcp-data-split is not enabled, the tcp-data-split-thresh will
> not be used and can't be configured.
>
> # ethtool -G enp14s0f0np0 tcp-data-split off
> # ethtool -g enp14s0f0np0
> Ring parameters for enp14s0f0np0:
> Pre-set maximums:
> ...
> TCP data split thresh: 256
> Current hardware settings:
> ...
> TCP data split: off
> TCP data split thresh: n/a
My reply to Sridhar was probably quite unclear on this point, but FWIW
I do also have a weak preference to drop the "TCP" from the new knob.
Rephrasing what I said here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240911173150.571bf93b@kernel.org/
the old knob is defined as being about TCP but for the new one we can
pick how widely applicable it is (and make it cover UDP as well).
> The default/min/max values are not defined in the ethtool so the drivers
> should define themself.
> The 0 value means that all TCP and UDP packets' header and payload
> will be split.
> diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> index 12f6dc567598..891f55b0f6aa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ enum {
> * @cqe_size: Size of TX/RX completion queue event
> * @tx_push_buf_len: Size of TX push buffer
> * @tx_push_buf_max_len: Maximum allowed size of TX push buffer
> + * @tcp_data_split_thresh: Threshold value of tcp-data-split
> + * @tcp_data_split_thresh_max: Maximum allowed threshold of tcp-data-split-threshold
Please wrap at 80 chars:
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --max-line-length=80 --strict $patch..
> static int rings_fill_reply(struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -108,7 +110,13 @@ static int rings_fill_reply(struct sk_buff *skb,
> (nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN_MAX,
> kr->tx_push_buf_max_len) ||
> nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN,
> - kr->tx_push_buf_len))))
> + kr->tx_push_buf_len))) ||
> + (kr->tcp_data_split == ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_ENABLED &&
Please add a new ETHTOOL_RING_USE_* flag for this, or fix all the
drivers which set ETHTOOL_RING_USE_TCP_DATA_SPLIT already and use that.
I don't think we should hide the value when HDS is disabled.
> + (nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH,
> + kr->tcp_data_split_thresh))) ||
nit: unnecessary brackets around the nla_put_u32()
> + (kr->tcp_data_split == ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_ENABLED &&
> + (nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH_MAX,
> + kr->tcp_data_split_thresh_max))))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
>
> return 0;
> + if (tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH] &&
> + !(ops->supported_ring_params & ETHTOOL_RING_USE_TCP_DATA_SPLIT)) {
here you use the existing flag, yet gve and idpf set that flag and will
ignore the setting silently. They need to be changed or we need a new
flag.
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack,
> + tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH],
> + "setting tcp-data-split-thresh is not supported");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> if (tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_CQE_SIZE] &&
> !(ops->supported_ring_params & ETHTOOL_RING_USE_CQE_SIZE)) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack,
> @@ -196,9 +213,9 @@ ethnl_set_rings(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info, struct genl_info *info)
> struct kernel_ethtool_ringparam kernel_ringparam = {};
> struct ethtool_ringparam ringparam = {};
> struct net_device *dev = req_info->dev;
> + bool mod = false, thresh_mod = false;
> struct nlattr **tb = info->attrs;
> const struct nlattr *err_attr;
> - bool mod = false;
> int ret;
>
> dev->ethtool_ops->get_ringparam(dev, &ringparam,
> @@ -222,9 +239,30 @@ ethnl_set_rings(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info, struct genl_info *info)
> tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX_PUSH], &mod);
> ethnl_update_u32(&kernel_ringparam.tx_push_buf_len,
> tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN], &mod);
> - if (!mod)
> + ethnl_update_u32(&kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split_thresh,
> + tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH],
> + &thresh_mod);
> + if (!mod && !thresh_mod)
> return 0;
>
> + if (kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split == ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_DISABLED &&
> + thresh_mod) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack,
> + tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH],
> + "tcp-data-split-thresh can not be updated while tcp-data-split is disabled");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
I'm not sure we need to reject changing the setting when HDS is
disabled. Driver can just store the value until HDS gets enabled?
WDYT? I don't have a strong preference.
> + if (kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split_thresh >
> + kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split_thresh_max) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR_FMT(info->extack,
> + tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH_MAX],
> + "Requested tcp-data-split-thresh exceeds the maximum of %u",
No need for the string, just NL_SET_BAD_ATTR() + ERANGE is enough
> + kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split_thresh_max);
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
ERANGE
> + }
> +
> /* ensure new ring parameters are within limits */
> if (ringparam.rx_pending > ringparam.rx_max_pending)
> err_attr = tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 16:06 [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] bnxt_en: implement device memory TCP for bnxt Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] bnxt_en: add support for rx-copybreak ethtool command Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:57 ` Brett Creeley
2024-10-03 17:15 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 17:13 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-03 17:22 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 17:43 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-03 18:28 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-10-05 6:29 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 18:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-08 19:38 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-08 19:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-08 20:35 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] bnxt_en: add support for tcp-data-split " Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 18:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 13:54 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-09 15:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 17:47 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-31 17:34 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-31 23:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-01 17:11 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] net: ethtool: add support for configuring tcp-data-split-thresh Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:25 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-03 19:33 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-04 1:47 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-05 6:11 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 18:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-10-09 14:25 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-09 15:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 17:49 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/7] bnxt_en: add support for tcp-data-split-thresh ethtool command Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:13 ` Brett Creeley
2024-10-03 19:13 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 18:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 14:31 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/7] net: devmem: add ring parameter filtering Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:29 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-04 3:57 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:35 ` Brett Creeley
2024-10-03 18:49 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-08 19:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 14:35 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-04 4:01 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/7] net: ethtool: " Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:32 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-03 19:35 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/7] bnxt_en: add support for device memory tcp Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:43 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-04 10:34 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 2:57 ` David Wei
2024-10-09 15:02 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 19:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 15:37 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-10 0:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-10 17:44 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-11 1:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-11 17:33 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-11 23:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-14 22:38 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-15 0:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-15 1:10 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-15 12:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-18 8:25 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-19 13:55 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-15 14:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-10-15 17:38 ` David Wei
2024-10-05 3:48 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-08 2:45 ` David Wei
2024-10-08 3:54 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 3:58 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-16 20:17 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] bnxt_en: implement device memory TCP for bnxt Stanislav Fomichev
2024-10-17 8:58 ` Taehee Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241008113314.243f7c36@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ahmed.zaki@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=bcreeley@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kaiyuanz@google.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.greenwalt@intel.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.