From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, surenb@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mjguzik@gmail.com,
brauner@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
vbabka@suse.cz, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 0/5] uprobes,mm: speculative lockless VMA-to-uprobe lookup
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:20:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241008152056.GA9508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241001225207.2215639-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Well. I am in no position to ack these changes.
But let me say that I personally like this series and I see nothing wrong,
except perhaps 5/5 needs some data_race/etc annotations as we have already
discussed.
Thanks,
Oleg.
On 10/01, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> Implement speculative (lockless) resolution of VMA to inode to uprobe,
> bypassing the need to take mmap_lock for reads, if possible. Patch #1 by Suren
> adds mm_struct helpers that help detect whether mm_struct were changed, which
> is used by uprobe logic to validate that speculative results can be trusted
> after all the lookup logic results in a valid uprobe instance. Patch #2
> follows to make mm_lock_seq into 64-bit counter (on 64-bit architectures).
>
> Patch #3 adds back RCU-delayed freeing for FMODE_BACKING files, which is
> necessary to make speculation safe to access struct file's memory in any
> possible situation.
>
> Patch #4 is a simplification to uprobe VMA flag checking, suggested by Oleg.
>
> And, finally, patch #5 is the speculative VMA-to-uprobe resolution logic. See
> corresponding patch for details and benchmarking results.
>
> v1->v2:
> - adjusted vma_end_write_all() comment to point out it should never be called
> manually now, but I wasn't sure how ACQUIRE/RELEASE comments should be
> reworded (previously requested by Jann), so I'd appreciate some help there
> (Jann);
> - int -> long change for mm_lock_seq, as agreed at LPC2024 (Jann, Suren, Liam);
> - kfree_rcu_mightsleep() for FMODE_BACKING (Suren, Christian);
> - vm_flags simplification in find_active_uprobe_rcu() and
> find_active_uprobe_speculative() (Oleg);
> - guard(rcu)() simplified find_active_uprobe_speculative() implementation.
>
> Andrii Nakryiko (4):
> mm: switch to 64-bit mm_lock_seq/vm_lock_seq on 64-bit architectures
> fs: add back RCU-delayed freeing of FMODE_BACKING file
> uprobes: simplify find_active_uprobe_rcu() VMA checks
> uprobes: add speculative lockless VMA-to-inode-to-uprobe resolution
>
> Suren Baghdasaryan (1):
> mm: introduce mmap_lock_speculation_{start|end}
>
> fs/file_table.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/mm.h | 6 ++--
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 7 ++--
> include/linux/mmap_lock.h | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/fork.c | 3 --
> 6 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.5
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-01 22:52 [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 0/5] uprobes,mm: speculative lockless VMA-to-uprobe lookup Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 1/5] mm: introduce mmap_lock_speculation_{start|end} Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-07 17:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 2/5] mm: switch to 64-bit mm_lock_seq/vm_lock_seq on 64-bit architectures Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 3/5] fs: add back RCU-delayed freeing of FMODE_BACKING file Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-03 9:13 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-04 8:01 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-04 19:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-09 10:35 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-09 19:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 4/5] uprobes: simplify find_active_uprobe_rcu() VMA checks Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-02 6:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-10-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 tip/perf/core 5/5] uprobes: add speculative lockless VMA-to-inode-to-uprobe resolution Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-02 7:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-10-02 20:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-03 9:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-10-04 23:59 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-05 1:12 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-08 15:20 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241008152056.GA9508@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.