All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: <skoteshwar@marvell.com>
Cc: Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>,
	Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
	<stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] interrupts: fix number of bytes read for vdev
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:01:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241008210107.7f41e36c@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007150403.1680983-1-skoteshwar@marvell.com>

On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:33:59 +0530
<skoteshwar@marvell.com> wrote:

> From: Satha Rao <skoteshwar@marvell.com>
> 
> Correct the number of bytes to read during vdev interrupt processing.
> The driver sets this value, and the rxtx interrupt handling already
> performs this correctly.
> 
> Fixes: 99998feec90 ("eal/linux: add interrupt type for vdev")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Satha Rao <skoteshwar@marvell.com>

Not sure how this works.
The code in eal_handle_interrupts sits on a epoll_wait() waiting
for next interrupt.

eal_inter_process_interrupts() is called.
The switch you modified decides what needs to be read to clear the interrupt.
If you change RTE_INTR_HANDLE_VDEV to read bytes from the eventfd 
by setting bytes_read then the code in this function will read the counter
value from the event fd immediately.

Then when eal_intr_proc_rxtx_intr() is called it will decide to read again.
And since the event is cleared, this read will get EWOULDBLOCK.

What exactly is the issue? How to reproduce it?

Also setting call = true in the switch is wrong.
The code later in eal_intr_process_interrupts that handles bytes_read > 0
already sets call = true if interrupt was cleared from eventfd.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-07 15:03 [PATCH 1/5] interrupts: fix number of bytes read for vdev skoteshwar
2024-10-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/virtio-user: get link duplex and speed skoteshwar
2024-10-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/virtio: add set config callback skoteshwar
2024-10-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/virtio: implement update link state API skoteshwar
2024-10-07 15:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] net/virtio-user: support vDPA configuration callback skoteshwar
2024-10-09  4:01 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241008210107.7f41e36c@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.