All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Fix rcuog wake-up from offline softirq
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:36:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010163609.51273-1-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)

After a CPU has set itself offline and before it eventually calls
rcutree_report_cpu_dead(), there are still opportunities for callbacks
to be enqueued, for example from a softirq. When that happens on NOCB,
the rcuog wake-up is deferred through an IPI to an online CPU in order
not to call into the scheduler and risk arming the RT-bandwidth after
hrtimers have been migrated out and disabled.

But performing a synchronized IPI from a softirq is buggy as reported in
the following scenario:

        WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 26 at kernel/smp.c:633 smp_call_function_single
        Modules linked in: rcutorture torture
        CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 26 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc1-00012-g9139f93209d1 #1
        Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x320 <- __stop_cpus+0xd0/0x120
        RIP: 0010:smp_call_function_single
        <IRQ>
        swake_up_one_online
        __call_rcu_nocb_wake
        __call_rcu_common
        ? rcu_torture_one_read
        call_timer_fn
        __run_timers
        run_timer_softirq
        handle_softirqs
        irq_exit_rcu
        ? tick_handle_periodic
        sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
        </IRQ>

Fix this with forcing deferred rcuog wake up through the NOCB timer when
the CPU is offline. The actual wake up will happen from
rcutree_report_cpu_dead().

Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231644.4c55582d-lkp@intel.com
Fixes: 9139f93209d1 ("rcu/nocb: Fix RT throttling hrtimer armed from offline CPU")
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 97b99cd06923..16865475120b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -554,13 +554,19 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_wake(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool was_alldone,
 			rcu_nocb_unlock(rdp);
 			wake_nocb_gp_defer(rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY,
 					   TPS("WakeLazy"));
-		} else if (!irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) {
+		} else if (!irqs_disabled_flags(flags) && cpu_online(rdp->cpu)) {
 			/* ... if queue was empty ... */
 			rcu_nocb_unlock(rdp);
 			wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
 			trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu,
 					    TPS("WakeEmpty"));
 		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Don't do the wake-up upfront on fragile paths.
+			 * Also offline CPUs can't call swake_up_one_online() from
+			 * (soft-)IRQs. Rely on the final deferred wake-up from
+			 * rcutree_report_cpu_dead()
+			 */
 			rcu_nocb_unlock(rdp);
 			wake_nocb_gp_defer(rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE,
 					   TPS("WakeEmptyIsDeferred"));
-- 
2.46.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-10-10 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-10 16:36 Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-10-22 17:23 ` [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Fix rcuog wake-up from offline softirq Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241010163609.51273-1-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.