All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv6 perf/core 01/16] uprobe: Add data pointer to consumer handlers
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 22:09:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010200957.2750179-2-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241010200957.2750179-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

Adding data pointer to both entry and exit consumer handlers and all
its users. The functionality itself is coming in following change.

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/uprobes.h                              |  4 ++--
 kernel/events/uprobes.c                              |  4 ++--
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c                             |  6 ++++--
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c                          | 12 ++++++++----
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c  |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index 2b294bf1881f..bb265a632b91 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ struct uprobe_consumer {
 	 * for the current process. If filter() is omitted or returns true,
 	 * UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE is effectively ignored.
 	 */
-	int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs);
+	int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs, __u64 *data);
 	int (*ret_handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self,
 				unsigned long func,
-				struct pt_regs *regs);
+				struct pt_regs *regs, __u64 *data);
 	bool (*filter)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct mm_struct *mm);
 
 	struct list_head cons_node;
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 2a0059464383..6b44c386a5df 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -2090,7 +2090,7 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		int rc = 0;
 
 		if (uc->handler) {
-			rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
+			rc = uc->handler(uc, regs, NULL);
 			WARN(rc & ~UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK,
 				"bad rc=0x%x from %ps()\n", rc, uc->handler);
 		}
@@ -2128,7 +2128,7 @@ handle_uretprobe_chain(struct return_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	rcu_read_lock_trace();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) {
 		if (uc->ret_handler)
-			uc->ret_handler(uc, ri->func, regs);
+			uc->ret_handler(uc, ri->func, regs, NULL);
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock_trace();
 }
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index a582cd25ca87..fdab7ecd8dfa 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3244,7 +3244,8 @@ uprobe_multi_link_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct mm_struct *mm)
 }
 
 static int
-uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
+uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			  __u64 *data)
 {
 	struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe;
 
@@ -3253,7 +3254,8 @@ uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
 }
 
 static int
-uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs)
+uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			      __u64 *data)
 {
 	struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe;
 
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index c40531d2cbad..5895eabe3581 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -89,9 +89,11 @@ static struct trace_uprobe *to_trace_uprobe(struct dyn_event *ev)
 static int register_uprobe_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu);
 static int unregister_uprobe_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu);
 
-static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs);
+static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			     __u64 *data);
 static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con,
-				unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs);
+				unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs,
+				__u64 *data);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
 static unsigned long adjust_stack_addr(unsigned long addr, unsigned int n)
@@ -1517,7 +1519,8 @@ trace_uprobe_register(struct trace_event_call *event, enum trace_reg type,
 	}
 }
 
-static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			     __u64 *data)
 {
 	struct trace_uprobe *tu;
 	struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd;
@@ -1548,7 +1551,8 @@ static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
 }
 
 static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con,
-				unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs)
+				unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs,
+				__u64 *data)
 {
 	struct trace_uprobe *tu;
 	struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 8835761d9a12..12005e3dc3e4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file __ro_after_init = {
 
 static int
 uprobe_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *self, unsigned long func,
-		   struct pt_regs *regs)
+		   struct pt_regs *regs, __u64 *data)
 
 {
 	regs->ax  = 0x12345678deadbeef;
-- 
2.46.2


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-10 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-10 20:09 [PATCHv6 bpf-next,perf/core 00/16] uprobe, bpf: Add session support Jiri Olsa
2024-10-10 20:09 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2024-10-15 22:24   ` [PATCHv6 perf/core 01/16] uprobe: Add data pointer to consumer handlers Masami Hiramatsu
2024-10-16  6:41     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 perf/core 02/16] uprobe: Add support for session consumer Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11 11:27   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-10-16  0:07   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 03/16] bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for kprobe session Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:19   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 04/16] bpf: Force uprobe bpf program to always return 0 Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:20   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 05/16] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 06/16] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session context Jiri Olsa
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 07/16] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:21   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 08/16] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session test Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 09/16] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session cookie test Jiri Olsa
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 10/16] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session recursive test Jiri Olsa
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 11/16] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session verifier test for return value Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:23   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 12/16] selftests/bpf: Add kprobe " Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:24   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 13/16] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session single consumer test Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:25   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-11 11:33     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 14/16] selftests/bpf: Scale down uprobe multi " Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:27   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-11 11:36     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 15/16] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to " Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:30   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-11 11:36     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-10-10 20:09 ` [PATCHv6 bpf-next 16/16] selftests/bpf: Add threads " Jiri Olsa
2024-10-11  2:35   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241010200957.2750179-2-jolsa@kernel.org \
    --to=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.