From: Tyrone Wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, wudevelops@gmail.com
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@netfilter.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
riel@surriel.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: add asserts for netfilter link info
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 19:32:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011193252.178997-2-wudevelops@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011193252.178997-1-wudevelops@gmail.com>
Add assertions/tests to verify `bpf_link_info` fields for netfilter link
are correctly populated.
Signed-off-by: Tyrone Wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c
index 4297a2a4cb11..5bf98ab2e17f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/netfilter_link_attach.c
@@ -26,10 +26,43 @@ static const struct nf_link_test nf_hook_link_tests[] = {
{ .pf = NFPROTO_INET, .priority = 1, .name = "invalid-inet-not-supported", },
- { .pf = NFPROTO_IPV4, .priority = -10000, .expect_success = true, .name = "attach ipv4", },
- { .pf = NFPROTO_IPV6, .priority = 10001, .expect_success = true, .name = "attach ipv6", },
+ {
+ .pf = NFPROTO_IPV4,
+ .hooknum = NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
+ .priority = -10000,
+ .flags = 0,
+ .expect_success = true,
+ .name = "attach ipv4",
+ },
+ {
+ .pf = NFPROTO_IPV6,
+ .hooknum = NF_INET_FORWARD,
+ .priority = 10001,
+ .flags = BPF_F_NETFILTER_IP_DEFRAG,
+ .expect_success = true,
+ .name = "attach ipv6",
+ },
};
+static void verify_netfilter_link_info(struct bpf_link *link, const struct nf_link_test nf_expected)
+{
+ struct bpf_link_info info;
+ __u32 len = sizeof(info);
+ int err, fd;
+
+ memset(&info, 0, len);
+
+ fd = bpf_link__fd(link);
+ err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "get_link_info");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.type, BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETFILTER, "info link type");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.netfilter.pf, nf_expected.pf, "info nf protocol family");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.netfilter.hooknum, nf_expected.hooknum, "info nf hooknum");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.netfilter.priority, nf_expected.priority, "info nf priority");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.netfilter.flags, nf_expected.flags, "info nf flags");
+}
+
void test_netfilter_link_attach(void)
{
struct test_netfilter_link_attach *skel;
@@ -63,6 +96,7 @@ void test_netfilter_link_attach(void)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "program attach successful"))
continue;
+ verify_netfilter_link_info(link, nf_hook_link_tests[i]);
link2 = bpf_program__attach_netfilter(prog, &opts);
ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link2, "attach program with same pf/hook/priority");
@@ -73,6 +107,8 @@ void test_netfilter_link_attach(void)
link2 = bpf_program__attach_netfilter(prog, &opts);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link2, "program reattach successful"))
continue;
+ verify_netfilter_link_info(link2, nf_hook_link_tests[i]);
+
if (!ASSERT_OK(bpf_link__destroy(link2), "link destroy"))
break;
} else {
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 19:32 [PATCH bpf v1 1/2] bpf: fix link info netfilter flags to populate defrag flag Tyrone Wu
2024-10-11 19:32 ` Tyrone Wu [this message]
2024-10-15 15:25 ` Florian Westphal
2024-10-16 15:13 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-10-16 15:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011193252.178997-2-wudevelops@gmail.com \
--to=wudevelops@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.