Re: [PATCH v6 08/12] efi_loader: Disable ANSI output for tests

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1839 bytes --]

On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 01:33:32PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 16:28, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 04:16:28PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Heinrich, Tom,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 16:18, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > The relevant error message is:
> > > >
> > > >      E   Exception: Bad pattern found on console: spl_signon
> > > >
> > > > The error occurs because the substring
> > > >
> > > >      U-Boot SPL 2024.10
> > > >
> > > > occurs multiple times during the reboot process. This is not expected in
> > > > wait_for_boot_prompt().
> > > >
> > > > The EFI test is resetting the board and then calling restart_uboot()
> > > > which by itself does another reset.
> > >
> > > We had this discussion a while back and I was very-much opposed to
> > > restarting U-Boot within a test. It has set a bad precedent and now
> > > several tests do it.
> > >
> > > This is another EFI thing that I would like to resolve at some point.
> > > As previously mentioned, I understand we might be one test to check
> > > that U-Boot does actually kick up a firmware update when started, but
> > > I don't think we should be restarting willy-nilly.
> >
> > We should indeed not be restarting willy-nilly. And we don't. But the
> > test for "can we restart the system" must restart the system. That's the
> > test. It's not changing. Testing if we can restart the system by faking
> > the restart is not testing restarting the system.
> 
> If it were just one test I would be OK with it...but it has spread,
> unfortunately. When I run under gdb I constantly have to manually
> restart U-Boot.

Then I'm sorry to say you picked a bad example to bring this up on.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]