From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:35:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410141330.CAF56E3@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e8d49d2-e89b-44df-9dff-29e8f24de105@suse.cz>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 03:12:09PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/14/24 14:52, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:53:32AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> On 10/14/24 09:52, Feng Tang wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 05:52:10PM +0800, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> > Thanks for the suggestion!
> >> >
> >> > As there were error report about the NULL slab for big kmalloc object, how
> >> > about the following code for
> >> >
> >> > __do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
> >> > {
> >> > void *ret;
> >> > size_t ks = 0;
> >> > int orig_size = 0;
> >> > struct kmem_cache *s = NULL;
> >> >
> >> > /* Check for double-free. */
> >> > if (likely(!ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(p))) {
> >> > if (!kasan_check_byte(p))
> >> > return NULL;
> >> >
> >> > ks = ksize(p);
> >>
> >> I think this will result in __ksize() doing
> >> skip_orig_size_check(folio_slab(folio)->slab_cache, object);
> >> and we don't want that?
> >
> > I think that's fine. As later code will re-set the orig_size anyway.
>
> But you also read it first.
>
> >> > /* Some objects have no orig_size, like big kmalloc case */
> >> > if (is_kfence_address(p)) {
> >> > orig_size = kfence_ksize(p);
> >> > } else if (virt_to_slab(p)) {
> >> > s = virt_to_cache(p);
> >> > orig_size = get_orig_size(s, (void *)p);
>
> here.
>
> >> > }
>
> >> Also the checks below repeat some of the checks of ksize().
> >
> > Yes, there is some redundancy, mostly the virt_to_slab()
> >
> >> So I think in __do_krealloc() we should do things manually to determine ks
> >> and not call ksize(). Just not break any of the cases ksize() handles
> >> (kfence, large kmalloc).
> >
> > OK, originally I tried not to expose internals of __ksize(). Let me
> > try this way.
>
> ksize() makes assumptions that a user outside of slab itself is calling it.
>
> But we (well mostly Kees) also introduced kmalloc_size_roundup() to avoid
> querying ksize() for the purposes of writing beyond the original
> kmalloc(size) up to the bucket size. So maybe we can also investigate if the
> skip_orig_size_check() mechanism can be removed now?
>
> Still I think __do_krealloc() should rather do its own thing and not call
> ksize().
The goal was to avoid having users of the allocation APIs change the
sizes of allocations without calling into realloc. This is because
otherwise the "alloc_size" attribute used by compilers inform
__builtin_dynamic_object_size() can get confused:
ptr = alloc(less_than_bucket_size);
...
size = ksize(ptr); /* larger size! */
memcpy(ptr, src, size); /* compiler instrumentation doesn't see that ptr "grows" */
So the callers use kmalloc_size_roundup() to just allocate the rounded
up size immediately. Internally, the allocator can do what it wants.
--
Kees Cook
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 6:45 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/kasan: Don't store metadata inside kmalloc object when slub_debug_orig_size is on Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/slub: Consider kfence case for get_orig_size() Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/slub: Move krealloc() and related code to slub.c Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/slub: Improve redzone check and zeroing for krealloc() Feng Tang
2024-09-12 15:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-09-13 1:24 ` Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/slub, kunit: Add testcase for krealloc redzone and zeroing Feng Tang
2024-10-02 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 6:44 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-04 9:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 9:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 10:28 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 7:52 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 8:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 12:52 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 13:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 14:20 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-11-04 11:28 ` Feng Tang
2024-11-04 11:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-04 12:37 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 20:35 ` Kees Cook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410141330.CAF56E3@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.