From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:24:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241014152428.GQ21840@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014060725.GA20751@lst.de>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:07:25AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 01:49:36AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > Thanks for reworking this patch, it's been merged into fstests, named
> > xfs/629~632. But now these 4 cases always fail on upstream xfs, e.g
> > (diff output) [1][2][3][4]. Could you help to take a look at the
> > failure which Darick metioned above too :)
>
> What do you mean with upstream xfs? Any kernel before the eofblocks
> fixes will obviously fail. Always_cow will also always fail and I'll
> send a patch for that. Any other configuration you've seen?
fsdax, any config with an extent size hint set, and any time
sb_rextsize > 1 fsblock.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-24 8:45 xfs post-EOF block freeing fixes v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 8:45 ` [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 15:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-25 11:15 ` Zorro Lang
2024-09-26 12:31 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-01 14:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-02 13:38 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-02 14:35 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-02 14:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-02 15:56 ` Brian Foster
2024-10-02 20:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-13 17:49 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-14 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-14 14:14 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-14 15:24 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-10-14 17:46 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-15 3:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-23 5:38 xfs post-EOF block freeing fixes Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23 5:38 ` [PATCH] xfs: new EOF fragmentation tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23 13:03 ` Zorro Lang
2024-06-24 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-11 1:36 Dave Chinner
2019-02-11 1:55 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-12 14:03 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-12 21:04 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-13 13:39 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-16 10:04 ` Eryu Guan
2019-02-17 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241014152428.GQ21840@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.