From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B2213BC02; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728943603; cv=none; b=cSrQzfeF6sRd7oL/pFq75YpFJ75AU+VzbaAqb55a21BD3PmpiX6gu/9gA7pQ4HLE9q6o7Nd7KAp9qjum7UqaAp3qa2njUoa3P2/M2/T9RBMf7fsCvvrByJjLk5sXjVkQHMW/StyM1n+7qLW6wbQJEGZPizsRcrVVzOCuZV54AIU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728943603; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EZGFjWUqgzzMHtQSrMpOfKThJLG8PtzV5H6tNxA6KXM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aDoGyWYPWEmVaZZ2kKH36Wuzrn2KYZqaB1ZjmU4gK/qOu4+z2BTfcjDVQxYrwOPyRc5WKsUcACx4xMy6eTNzVlNtV/PKJUmymhL37bWNWHw6K9kM0UcGlFUNRETv3R4U19FA/68r1TuagJj8eZR2FXsAO1VJrBrXJw955VwTbRA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=0gukJgxN; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=3IjPwouf; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=0gukJgxN; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=3IjPwouf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="0gukJgxN"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="3IjPwouf"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="0gukJgxN"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="3IjPwouf" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856891F7B0; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:06:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1728943598; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KXYy1ae4i2l5W8H+gc40HSWB7rYf7Al69VJDG7F/UPU=; b=0gukJgxN+HbsNL4X9mBoGyxgIjbGI1fTtGlM5/IrNPXumAw19sIF9nhw+aMCz2QYDi4S13 TV+0OZ6Ej1AYYKTIQR2TpE7+MI7BdDYJ75crJYiGRMGbEs1+407UrxnTIv9aipktHlHTmP O19IyFmme2f7AkKGcatuAa0Q0MpOsEs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1728943598; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KXYy1ae4i2l5W8H+gc40HSWB7rYf7Al69VJDG7F/UPU=; b=3IjPwoufJMJKuBjlZ4XgfiT8jCZbEmRo+P8u+SjZTHouSLhkno/zpoYXFPynhwy/O5bl3y dwtewmSa1A5xg0BQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1728943598; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KXYy1ae4i2l5W8H+gc40HSWB7rYf7Al69VJDG7F/UPU=; b=0gukJgxN+HbsNL4X9mBoGyxgIjbGI1fTtGlM5/IrNPXumAw19sIF9nhw+aMCz2QYDi4S13 TV+0OZ6Ej1AYYKTIQR2TpE7+MI7BdDYJ75crJYiGRMGbEs1+407UrxnTIv9aipktHlHTmP O19IyFmme2f7AkKGcatuAa0Q0MpOsEs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1728943598; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KXYy1ae4i2l5W8H+gc40HSWB7rYf7Al69VJDG7F/UPU=; b=3IjPwoufJMJKuBjlZ4XgfiT8jCZbEmRo+P8u+SjZTHouSLhkno/zpoYXFPynhwy/O5bl3y dwtewmSa1A5xg0BQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563AB13A51; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id MniSFO6VDWfZawAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:06:38 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:06:37 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Filipe Manana Cc: kernel test robot , llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , David Sterba , Qu Wenruo Subject: Re: [linux-next:pending-fixes 207/319] fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:2014:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bytenr' Message-ID: <20241014220637.GF1609@suse.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz References: <202410091038.SI34ZULQ-lkp@intel.com> <20241009113029.GJ1609@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Level: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[dsterba@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_TO_DOM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: -4.00 X-Spam-Flag: NO On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 05:26:26PM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote: > > > David, how do you prefer to proceed here? Do you want me to fix this > > > and resend the patchset? > > > > No need to resend, I'll fix it locally, the patch in next-fixes was the > > old one so I'll sync it with what's in our development for-next (and > > also check the others just in case). I'll also check and update all the > > branches involved in the for-next pulled by linux-next. > > Btw, I noticed that only the 2nd patch ("btrfs: use sector numbers as > keys for the dirty extents xarray") was updated, > so now it doesn't break 32 bits builds anymore. > > However the next patch in the series ("btrfs: qgroups: remove bytenr > field from struct btrfs_qgroup_extent_record") wasn't updated, > and it now breaks 32 bits builds. At the same location, it needs to > use "bytenr" instead of "record->bytenr". My bad, I manually tested the build combinations in the first patch only as it went to Linus' tree. I did not get any other linux-next build failures though. > Do you want me to update the patches and send them to the list? > > There's one more change that needs to be squashed (to that last patch) > that triggers a use-after-free reported by syzbot, which is: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/02fc507b62b19be2348fc08de8b13bd7af1a440e.1728922973.git.fdmanana@suse.com/ Ok, please send it and feel free to update the patch in for-next too. Thanks.