From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Handle BPF_UPTR in verifier
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:49:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241015005008.767267-3-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241015005008.767267-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>
From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
This patch adds BPF_UPTR support to the verifier. Not that only the
map_value will support the "__uptr" type tag.
This patch enforces only BPF_LDX is allowed to the value of an uptr.
After BPF_LDX, it will mark the dst_reg as PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL
with size deduced from the field.kptr.btf_id. This will make the
dst_reg pointed memory to be readable and writable as scalar.
There is a redundant "val_reg = reg_state(env, value_regno);" statement
in the check_map_kptr_access(). This patch takes this chance to remove
it also.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v5:
- The "if (kptr_field->type == BPF_UPTR)" addition in v4 in
map_kptr_match_type() is removed. It will not be reached.
meta->kptr_field is for kptr only.
- Use btf_field_type_name() for the verbose() log in check_map_access().
- Directly use t->size in mark_uptr_ld_reg. "t" must be a struct.
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index cfc62e0776bf..792154ee25cc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5485,6 +5485,22 @@ static u32 btf_ld_kptr_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct btf_field *kptr
return ret;
}
+static int mark_uptr_ld_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
+ struct btf_field *field)
+{
+ struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
+ const struct btf_type *t;
+
+ t = btf_type_by_id(field->kptr.btf, field->kptr.btf_id);
+ mark_reg_known_zero(env, cur_regs(env), regno);
+ reg = reg_state(env, regno);
+ reg->type = PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
+ reg->mem_size = t->size;
+ reg->id = ++env->id_gen;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int check_map_kptr_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
int value_regno, int insn_idx,
struct btf_field *kptr_field)
@@ -5513,9 +5529,15 @@ static int check_map_kptr_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
verbose(env, "store to referenced kptr disallowed\n");
return -EACCES;
}
+ if (class != BPF_LDX && kptr_field->type == BPF_UPTR) {
+ verbose(env, "store to uptr disallowed\n");
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
if (class == BPF_LDX) {
- val_reg = reg_state(env, value_regno);
+ if (kptr_field->type == BPF_UPTR)
+ return mark_uptr_ld_reg(env, value_regno, kptr_field);
+
/* We can simply mark the value_regno receiving the pointer
* value from map as PTR_TO_BTF_ID, with the correct type.
*/
@@ -5573,21 +5595,26 @@ static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
case BPF_KPTR_UNREF:
case BPF_KPTR_REF:
case BPF_KPTR_PERCPU:
+ case BPF_UPTR:
if (src != ACCESS_DIRECT) {
- verbose(env, "kptr cannot be accessed indirectly by helper\n");
+ verbose(env, "%s cannot be accessed indirectly by helper\n",
+ btf_field_type_name(field->type));
return -EACCES;
}
if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
- verbose(env, "kptr access cannot have variable offset\n");
+ verbose(env, "%s access cannot have variable offset\n",
+ btf_field_type_name(field->type));
return -EACCES;
}
if (p != off + reg->var_off.value) {
- verbose(env, "kptr access misaligned expected=%u off=%llu\n",
+ verbose(env, "%s access misaligned expected=%u off=%llu\n",
+ btf_field_type_name(field->type),
p, off + reg->var_off.value);
return -EACCES;
}
if (size != bpf_size_to_bytes(BPF_DW)) {
- verbose(env, "kptr access size must be BPF_DW\n");
+ verbose(env, "%s access size must be BPF_DW\n",
+ btf_field_type_name(field->type));
return -EACCES;
}
break;
@@ -6953,7 +6980,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
return err;
if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off))
kptr_field = btf_record_find(reg->map_ptr->record,
- off + reg->var_off.value, BPF_KPTR);
+ off + reg->var_off.value, BPF_KPTR | BPF_UPTR);
if (kptr_field) {
err = check_map_kptr_access(env, regno, value_regno, insn_idx, kptr_field);
} else if (t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) {
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-15 0:49 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/12] Share user memory to BPF program through task storage map Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Support __uptr type tag in BTF Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:49 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-10-15 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Add "bool swap_uptrs" arg to bpf_local_storage_update() and bpf_selem_alloc() Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Postpone bpf_selem_free() in bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock() Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Postpone bpf_obj_free_fields to the rcu callback Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Add uptr support in the map_value of the task local storage Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-22 23:07 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-23 0:57 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-24 0:44 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 07/12] libbpf: define __uptr Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Some basic __uptr tests Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Test a uptr struct spanning across pages Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add update_elem failure test for task storage uptr Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Add uptr failure verifier tests Martin KaFai Lau
2024-10-15 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: Create task_local_storage map with invalid uptr's struct Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241015005008.767267-3-martin.lau@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.