From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADD50D2068F for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 02:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BBE10E647; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 02:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C4z5s/QI"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org (nyc.source.kernel.org [147.75.193.91]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EC110E080; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 02:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E2DA40DD7; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 02:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28189C4CEC6; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 02:25:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729045534; bh=Jdptx5u4v/6E5gp57CYDnSwOan85kAY5Yrrs9yzpD4Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=C4z5s/QIbi4scSq1/pFzjwCxhTENqAU9wNPNPZpWCHzS5yFKT4n8SBn2aWiPvJ2mF K0EsQ+KSQd/4eudF++qNxhI5ebGeGjOFvXqYuZoHt3J1MmhThPxJTLX34UNSmCWj0b kY6p1luRxUgDrgfWWYadT5kwu1dX2/O8XyQo5IXiKh7hSXFyqo2aXf00izrInqlKys CciCGTPMC0rjsEz1tLNQSFvi619GwtJlVTKA0zVlZUsPJhoD1z1t7bJ08QIMsLi9OT ktFu4XOAr1CxQCkWz0KvIjAXnX4mt09iqoPAZJDm8OMuyQ1w5Sga2UYVP+hhuS4sWu K0hMCuJF1zWAQ== Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 19:25:32 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: kernel test robot Cc: Christian Brauner , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [fs] d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement) Message-ID: <20241016022532.GC1138@sol.localdomain> References: <202410151611.f4cd71f2-oliver.sang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202410151611.f4cd71f2-oliver.sang@intel.com> X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:19:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > kernel test robot noticed a -5.1% regression of stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec These emails that talk about negative regressions keep confusing me. A negative regression would be an improvement. But that is not actually what is meant. Wondering if the wording can be fixed to remove the minus sign. - Eric