From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: Add a new remoteproc state RPROC_DEFUNCT
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 11:55:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410161104.5ZIbsMLV-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014203118.1580024-1-quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Hi Mukesh,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on remoteproc/rproc-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241015]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mukesh-Ojha/remoteproc-Add-a-new-remoteproc-state-RPROC_DEFUNCT/20241015-043318
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/remoteproc/linux.git rproc-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014203118.1580024-1-quic_mojha%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: Add a new remoteproc state RPROC_DEFUNCT
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-002-20241016 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241016/202410161104.5ZIbsMLV-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241016/202410161104.5ZIbsMLV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410161104.5ZIbsMLV-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c: In function 'rproc_trigger_recovery':
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:1843:25: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
1843 | if (rproc_start == RPROC_DEFUNCT || rproc->state != RPROC_CRASHED)
| ^~
vim +1843 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
1820
1821 /**
1822 * rproc_trigger_recovery() - recover a remoteproc
1823 * @rproc: the remote processor
1824 *
1825 * The recovery is done by resetting all the virtio devices, that way all the
1826 * rpmsg drivers will be reseted along with the remote processor making the
1827 * remoteproc functional again.
1828 *
1829 * This function can sleep, so it cannot be called from atomic context.
1830 *
1831 * Return: 0 on success or a negative value upon failure
1832 */
1833 int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
1834 {
1835 struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
1836 int ret;
1837
1838 ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
1839 if (ret)
1840 return ret;
1841
1842 /* State could have changed before we got the mutex */
> 1843 if (rproc_start == RPROC_DEFUNCT || rproc->state != RPROC_CRASHED)
1844 goto unlock_mutex;
1845
1846 dev_err(dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name);
1847
1848 if (rproc_has_feature(rproc, RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_ON_RECOVERY))
1849 ret = rproc_attach_recovery(rproc);
1850 else
1851 ret = rproc_boot_recovery(rproc);
1852
1853 unlock_mutex:
1854 mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
1855 return ret;
1856 }
1857
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-16 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-14 20:31 [PATCH v2] remoteproc: Add a new remoteproc state RPROC_DEFUNCT Mukesh Ojha
2024-10-14 20:41 ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-10-16 3:55 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-10-16 4:16 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410161104.5ZIbsMLV-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.