All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 1/3] ring-buffer: Limit time with disabled interrupts in rb_check_pages()
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:07:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241018200758.725471379@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20241018200746.849970367@goodmis.org

From: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>

The function rb_check_pages() validates the integrity of a specified
per-CPU tracing ring buffer. It does so by traversing the underlying
linked list and checking its next and prev links.

To guarantee that the list isn't modified during the check, a caller
typically needs to take cpu_buffer->reader_lock. This prevents the check
from running concurrently, for example, with a potential reader which
can make the list temporarily inconsistent when swapping its old reader
page into the buffer.

A problem with this approach is that the time when interrupts are
disabled is non-deterministic, dependent on the ring buffer size. This
particularly affects PREEMPT_RT because the reader_lock is a raw
spinlock which doesn't become sleepable on PREEMPT_RT kernels.

Modify the check so it still attempts to traverse the entire list, but
gives up the reader_lock between checking individual pages. Introduce
for this purpose a new variable ring_buffer_per_cpu.cnt which is bumped
any time the list is modified. The value is used by rb_check_pages() to
detect such a change and restart the check.

Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20240715145141.5528-1-petr.pavlu@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index fb04445f92c3..a6a1c26ea2e3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ struct ring_buffer_per_cpu {
 	unsigned long			nr_pages;
 	unsigned int			current_context;
 	struct list_head		*pages;
+	/* pages generation counter, incremented when the list changes */
+	unsigned long			cnt;
 	struct buffer_page		*head_page;	/* read from head */
 	struct buffer_page		*tail_page;	/* write to tail */
 	struct buffer_page		*commit_page;	/* committed pages */
@@ -1475,40 +1477,88 @@ static void rb_check_bpage(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
 	RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, val & RB_FLAG_MASK);
 }
 
+static bool rb_check_links(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
+			   struct list_head *list)
+{
+	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
+		       rb_list_head(rb_list_head(list->next)->prev) != list))
+		return false;
+
+	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
+		       rb_list_head(rb_list_head(list->prev)->next) != list))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * rb_check_pages - integrity check of buffer pages
  * @cpu_buffer: CPU buffer with pages to test
  *
  * As a safety measure we check to make sure the data pages have not
  * been corrupted.
- *
- * Callers of this function need to guarantee that the list of pages doesn't get
- * modified during the check. In particular, if it's possible that the function
- * is invoked with concurrent readers which can swap in a new reader page then
- * the caller should take cpu_buffer->reader_lock.
  */
 static void rb_check_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
 {
-	struct list_head *head = rb_list_head(cpu_buffer->pages);
-	struct list_head *tmp;
+	struct list_head *head, *tmp;
+	unsigned long buffer_cnt;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int nr_loops = 0;
 
-	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
-			rb_list_head(rb_list_head(head->next)->prev) != head))
+	/*
+	 * Walk the linked list underpinning the ring buffer and validate all
+	 * its next and prev links.
+	 *
+	 * The check acquires the reader_lock to avoid concurrent processing
+	 * with code that could be modifying the list. However, the lock cannot
+	 * be held for the entire duration of the walk, as this would make the
+	 * time when interrupts are disabled non-deterministic, dependent on the
+	 * ring buffer size. Therefore, the code releases and re-acquires the
+	 * lock after checking each page. The ring_buffer_per_cpu.cnt variable
+	 * is then used to detect if the list was modified while the lock was
+	 * not held, in which case the check needs to be restarted.
+	 *
+	 * The code attempts to perform the check at most three times before
+	 * giving up. This is acceptable because this is only a self-validation
+	 * to detect problems early on. In practice, the list modification
+	 * operations are fairly spaced, and so this check typically succeeds at
+	 * most on the second try.
+	 */
+again:
+	if (++nr_loops > 3)
 		return;
 
-	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
-			rb_list_head(rb_list_head(head->prev)->next) != head))
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+	head = rb_list_head(cpu_buffer->pages);
+	if (!rb_check_links(cpu_buffer, head))
+		goto out_locked;
+	buffer_cnt = cpu_buffer->cnt;
+	tmp = head;
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 		return;
 
-	for (tmp = rb_list_head(head->next); tmp != head; tmp = rb_list_head(tmp->next)) {
-		if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
-				rb_list_head(rb_list_head(tmp->next)->prev) != tmp))
-			return;
+	while (true) {
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 
-		if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer,
-				rb_list_head(rb_list_head(tmp->prev)->next) != tmp))
-			return;
+		if (buffer_cnt != cpu_buffer->cnt) {
+			/* The list was updated, try again. */
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
+		tmp = rb_list_head(tmp->next);
+		if (tmp == head)
+			/* The iteration circled back, all is done. */
+			goto out_locked;
+
+		if (!rb_check_links(cpu_buffer, tmp))
+			goto out_locked;
+
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 	}
+
+out_locked:
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2535,6 +2585,7 @@ rb_remove_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, unsigned long nr_pages)
 
 	/* make sure pages points to a valid page in the ring buffer */
 	cpu_buffer->pages = next_page;
+	cpu_buffer->cnt++;
 
 	/* update head page */
 	if (head_bit)
@@ -2641,6 +2692,7 @@ rb_insert_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
 			 * pointer to point to end of list
 			 */
 			head_page->prev = last_page;
+			cpu_buffer->cnt++;
 			success = true;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -2876,12 +2928,8 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct trace_buffer *buffer, unsigned long size,
 		 */
 		synchronize_rcu();
 		for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
-			unsigned long flags;
-
 			cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
-			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 			rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
-			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 		}
 		atomic_dec(&buffer->record_disabled);
 	}
@@ -5299,6 +5347,7 @@ rb_get_reader_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
 	rb_list_head(reader->list.next)->prev = &cpu_buffer->reader_page->list;
 	rb_inc_page(&cpu_buffer->head_page);
 
+	cpu_buffer->cnt++;
 	local_inc(&cpu_buffer->pages_read);
 
 	/* Finally update the reader page to the new head */
@@ -5838,12 +5887,9 @@ void
 ring_buffer_read_finish(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter)
 {
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = iter->cpu_buffer;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Use this opportunity to check the integrity of the ring buffer. */
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 	rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 
 	atomic_dec(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled);
 	kfree(iter->event);
@@ -6758,6 +6804,7 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
 		cpu_buffer->pages = cpu_buffer->new_pages.next;
 		cpu_buffer->new_pages.next->prev = cpu_buffer->new_pages.prev;
 		cpu_buffer->new_pages.prev->next = cpu_buffer->new_pages.next;
+		cpu_buffer->cnt++;
 
 		/* Clear the new_pages list */
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpu_buffer->new_pages);
-- 
2.45.2



  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-18 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-18 20:07 [for-next][PATCH 0/3] ring-buffer: Updates for 6.13 Steven Rostedt
2024-10-18 20:07 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-10-18 20:07 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/3] ring-buffer: Reorganize kerneldoc parameter names Steven Rostedt
2024-10-18 20:07 ` [for-next][PATCH 3/3] ring-buffer: Use str_low_high() helper in ring_buffer_producer() Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241018200758.725471379@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.